Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Unprofitable horizontal mergers, external effects, and welfare

By Oliver Budzinski and J\ufcrgen-Peter Kretschmer


Standard analysis of mergers in oligopolies along the lines of the popular Farrell-Shapiro-Framework (FSF) relies regarding its policy conclusions sensitively on the assumption that rational agents will only propose privately profitable mergers. If this assumption held, a positive external effect of a proposed merger would represent a sufficient condition to allow the merger. However, the empirical picture on mergers and acquisitions reveals a significant share of unprofitable mergers and economic theory, moreover, demonstrates that privately unprofitable mergers can be the result of rational action. Therefore, we drop this restrictive assumption and allow for unprofitable mergers to occur. This exerts a considerable impact on merger policy conclusions: while several insights of the original analysis are corroborated (f.i. efficiency defence), a positive external effect does not represent a sufficient condition for the allowance of a merger anymore. Applying such a rule would cause a considerable amount of false decisions

Topics: L13, L41, K21, D43, ddc:330, mergers & acquisitions, oligopoly theory, horizontal merger policy, profitability of mergers, antitrust
Publisher: Ilmenau: Techn. Univ., Inst. f\ufcr Volkswirtschaftslehre
Year: 2015
OAI identifier:
Provided by: EconStor

Suggested articles

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.