Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

International trade and monopolistic competition without\ud CES : estimating translog gravity\ud

By Dennis Novy


This paper derives a micro-founded gravity equation in general equilibrium based on a translog demand system that allows for endogenous markups and rich substitution patterns across goods. In contrast to standard CES-based gravity equations, trade is more sensitive to trade costs if the exporting country only provides a small share of the destination country?s imports. As a result, trade costs have a heterogeneous impact across country pairs, with some trade flows predicted to be zero. I test the translog gravity equation and find strong empirical support in its favor. In an application to the currency union effect, I find that a currency union is only associated with substantially higher bilateral trade if the exporting country provides a small share of the destination country's imports. For other pairs, the currency union effect is modest or indistinguishable from zero. \ud \u

Topics: HF
Publisher: University of Warwick. Dept. of Economics
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). A Homothetic Utility Function for Monopolistic Competition Models, without Constant Price Elasticity. doi
  2. (1990). A Translog Approach to Consumer Spatial Behavior. doi
  3. (1980). An Almost Ideal Demand System. doi
  4. (1998). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? In: Jeffrey A. Frankel (Ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: doi
  5. (2008). Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade. doi
  6. (2009). Estimating Price Elasticities of Food Trade Functions. How Relevant is the CES-Based Gravity Approach? doi
  7. (2008). Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes. doi
  8. (1976). Exact and Superlative Index Numbers. doi
  9. (1986). Explaining the Volume of Trade: An Eclectic Approach.
  10. (2003). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. doi
  11. (2007). Has the EU’s Single Market Programme Fostered Competition? Testing for a Decrease in Mark-up Ratios doi
  12. (2009). How Important is the New Goods Margin in International Trade? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department,
  13. (2008). Market Size, Trade, and Productivity. doi
  14. (1994). New Product Varieties and the Measurement of International Prices.
  15. (2002). On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation. doi
  16. (2009). Pass-Through of Exchange Rates and Competition between Floaters and Fixers. doi
  17. (2007). Sharing Gravity: Gravity Estimates of Trade Shares in Agri-Food. Working
  18. (2000). Staggered Price Setting, Translog Preferences, and Endogenous Persistence. doi
  19. (2009). The Dynamics of Trade and Competition. doi
  20. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory doi
  21. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. doi
  22. (2008). The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade. doi
  23. (2005). The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Exports. doi
  24. (2004). Trade Costs. doi
  25. (2009). Trade Policy and Specialization in Developing Countries. doi
  26. (2008). Trade Responses to Geographic Frictions: A Decomposition Using Micro-Data. doi
  27. (1975). Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Functions.
  28. (2001). Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate Among Alternative Theories of Trade. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.