Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Full faith in credit? : the power of numbers in rating\ud frontier sovereigns and the global governance of\ud development by the UNDP 1\ud

By Arthur Mühlen-Schulte

Abstract

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is the oldest dedicated development institution in the multilateral system, yet remains one of the smallest in terms of funding and resources. This belies its\ud central role in contributing to rankings, benchmarks and ratings which have defined the process of development for states, nongovernment organisations and the private sector. The UNDP created the Human Development Index (HDI), coordinates the benchmarks of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and recently devised sovereign\ud credit ratings in partnership with Standard and Poor’s. In this regard mobilising numbers in support of development strategies is not new, yet it will be argued that the UNDPs development policy has seen a significant shift from the qualitative analysis of the HDI to the quantitative nature of credit rating. This paper will adopt a governmentality approach in looking at sovereign credit rating and the\ud way in which the power of numbers informs the rationality\ud underpinning the partnership between the UNDP and the rating agency Standard and Poor’s. It concludes that while pursuing sovereign credit rating may be seen as ‘capacity development’ for the UNDP, it in fact represents a shift by the organisation toward quantitative practices that\ud have particular consequences for the global governance of development.\u

Topics: HB
Publisher: University of Warwick
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:3563

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). Capital Rules, doi
  2. (2006). Credit FAQ: The Future Of Sovereign Credit Ratings, Standards & Poor’s Commentary, standardandpoors.com Broome, André (2008) The Importance of Being Earnest: The IMF as a Reputational Intermediary, New Political Economy,
  3. (2006). Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, Cambridge: doi
  4. (2004). Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces, doi
  5. (2008). Neoliberal Governance of States: The Role of Competitiveness Indexing and Country Benchmarking’, doi
  6. (2004). Rules for the World, doi
  7. (2002). The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance, Cambridge: doi
  8. (2005). The Power of Liberal International Organisations’, doi
  9. (2004). The Power of Partnerships in Global Governance’, Third World Quarterly, (25)8:1453 Africa Investor doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.