book

Neuroscience and legal responsibility

Abstract

Introduction / Nicole A. Vincent -- Criminal common law compatibilism / Stephen J. Morse -- What can neurosciences say about responsibility? : taking the distinction between theoretical and practical reason seriously / Anne Ruth Mackor -- Irrationality, mental capacities and neuroscience / Jillian Craigie and Alicia Coram -- Skepticism concerning human agency : sciences of the self vs. "voluntariness" in the law / Paul Sheldon Davies -- The implications of heuristics and biases research on moral and legal responsibility : a case against the reasonable person standard / Leora Dahan-Katz -- Moral responsibility and consciousness : two challenges, one solution / Neil Levy -- Translating scientific evidence into the language of the "folk" : executive function as capacity-responsibility / Katrina L. Sifferd -- Neuroscience, deviant appetites and the criminal law / Colin Gavaghan -- Is psychopathy a mental disease? / Thomas Nadelhoffer & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong -- Addiction, choice, and disease : how voluntary is voluntary action in addiction? / Jeanette Kennett -- How may neuroscience affect the way that the criminal courts deal with addicted offenders? / Wayne Hall & Adrian Carter -- Enhancing responsibility / Nicole A. Vincent -- Guilty minds in washed brains? : manipulation cases, excuses and the normative prerequisites of liberal legal orders / Christoph Bublitz & Reinhard Merkel.395 page(s

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Research from Macquarie University

redirect
Last time updated on 18/08/2016

This paper was published in Research from Macquarie University.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.