Location of Repository

British pain clinic practitioners' recognition and use of the bio-psychosocial pain management model for patients when physical interventions are ineffective or inappropriate : results of a qualitative study

By Geoffrey Harding, John L. Campbell, Suzanne Parsons, Anisur Anisur and Martin Underwood


Background\ud To explore how chronic musculoskeletal pain is managed in multidisciplinary pain clinics for patients for whom physical interventions are inappropriate or ineffective.\ud \ud Methods\ud A qualitative study was undertaken using semi-structured interviews with twenty five members of the pain management team drawn from seven pain clinics and one pain management unit located across the UK.\ud \ud Results\ud All clinics reported using a multidisciplinary bio-psychosocial model. However the chronic pain management strategy actually focussed on psychological approaches in preference to physical approaches. These approaches were utilised by all practitioners irrespective of their discipline. Consideration of social elements such as access to social support networks to support patients in managing their chronic pain was conspicuously absent from the approaches used.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud Pain clinic practitioners readily embraced cognitive/behavioural based management strategies but relatively little consideration to the impact social factors played in managing chronic pain was reported. Consequently multidisciplinary pain clinics espousing a bio-psychosocial model of pain management may not be achieving their maximum potential.\ud \u

Topics: RB
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:3858

Suggested articles



  1. (1996). (Eds): Psychological Approaches to Pain Management: A practitioner’s handbook.
  2. (1999). (Eds): Psychosocial Factors in Pain: Critical perspectives.
  3. (1992). (Eds): Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique.
  4. (2004). (eds): Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice: Themes, Methods and Approaches. doi
  5. (2000). Action and Narrative: Two dynamics of clinical reasoning.
  6. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. doi
  7. (2005). Chartered Society of Physiotherapy: Core standards of Physiotherapy Practice. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy doi
  8. (1999). Chronic pain: A bio behavioural perspective. Psychosocial factors in pain: Critical perspectives
  9. (1990). Customizing treatment for chronic pain patients: Who, what, and why. doi
  10. (2001). et al: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. Br Med J
  11. (2003). Harding G: Understanding the process of care for musculoskeletal conditions: why a biomedical approach is inadequate. Rheumatology doi
  12. (2008). How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain doi
  13. (2005). It struck me that they didn’t understand pain. Full stop": What do patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain think about the treatment they receive from their doctors?. Arthritis Care and Research doi
  14. (2001). Melzack R: Handbook of pain assessment
  15. (2005). NE: Do physical therapists in the United Kingdom recognize psychosocial factors in patients with acute low back pain?. Spine doi
  16. (2007). NE: Health care practitioners’ attitudes and beliefs about low back pain: a systematic search and critical review of available measurement tools. Pain doi
  17. (2006). Ohmura A: Efficacy of interdisciplinary treatment for chronic nonmalignant pain patients in Japan. doi
  18. (2007). Patient expectations of physiotherapy: Definitions, concepts, and theories. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice doi
  19. (1999). Psychological mechanisms of pain and analgesia:
  20. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research’. Analysing Qualitative Data Routledge, LondonBryman A, Burgess RG doi
  21. (1997). Qualitative Methods: Beyond the Cookbook. Family Practice doi
  22. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart doi
  23. (2007). Society: Recommended guidelines for Pain Management Programmes for adults. A consensus statement prepared on behalf of The British Pain Society,
  24. (1999). Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive-behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain doi
  25. (1983). The bio psychosocial model as applied to a multidisciplinary pain management programme.
  26. (2007). The influence of patients’ and primary care practitioners’ beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care: A systematic review of qualitative studies. doi
  27. (1992). Turk DC: “Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review”. Pain doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.