Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Visual marking and facial affect : can an emotional face be ignored?

By Elisabeth Blagrove and Derrick G. Watson

Abstract

Previewing a set of distractors allows them to be ignored in a subsequent visual search task (Watson & Humphreys, 1997). Seven experiments investigated whether this preview benefit can be obtained with emotional faces, and whether negative and positive facial expressions differ in the extent to which they can be ignored. Experiments 1–5 examined the preview benefit with neutral, negative, and positive previewed faces. These results showed that a partial preview benefit occurs with face stimuli, but that the valence of the previewed faces has little impact. Experiments 6 and 7 examined the time course of the preview benefit with valenced faces. These showed that negative faces were more difficult to ignore than positive faces, but only at short preview durations. Furthermore, a full preview benefit was not obtained with face stimuli even when the preview duration was extended up to 3 s. The findings are discussed in terms of the processes underlying the preview benefit, their ecological sensitivity, and the role of emotional valence in attentional capture and guidance

Topics: BF
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:3860

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. 1273, Processing the Facial Image.
  2. (2008). A neural marker of active ignoring. doi
  3. (2004). An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search. doi
  4. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing. doi
  5. (2005). At first sight: A high-level pop out effect for faces. doi
  6. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. doi
  7. (2006). Attentional bias to angry faces using the dotprobe task? It depends when you look for it. doi
  8. (2002). Attentional control of the processing of neutral and emotional stimuli. doi
  9. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention- grabbing power of negative social information. doi
  10. (1992). Becoming a face expert. doi
  11. (2003). Cerebral patterns of attentional habituation to emotional visual stimuli. doi
  12. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contribution of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. doi
  13. (2003). Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search. doi
  14. (2005). Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search, doi
  15. (1998). Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala.
  16. (2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. doi
  17. (2007). Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. doi
  18. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety. doi
  19. (1991). Does anxiety lead to selective processing of threat-related information? doi
  20. (2000). Does unattended information facilitate change detection? doi
  21. (2007). Early color grouping and late color inhibition: Evidence for distinct temporal windows for separate processes in preview search. doi
  22. (2001). Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study. doi
  23. (2004). Effects of colour on preview search: Anticipatory and inhibitory biases for colour. doi
  24. (2001). Emotional expressions capture attention. doi
  25. (2007). Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing. doi
  26. (1993). Faces and facial expressions do not pop out. doi
  27. (1993). Fear and anxiety as emotional phenomena: clinical phenomenology, evolutionary perspectives, and information processing mechanisms.
  28. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. doi
  29. (2005). Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces. doi
  30. (2002). Fractionating the preview benefit: Dual-task decomposition by timing and modality. doi
  31. (1994). It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd. doi
  32. (1998). Judging words at face value: Interference in a word processing task reveals automatic processing of affective facial expressions. doi
  33. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. doi
  34. (2003). May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. doi
  35. (2008). Mechanisms of face perception. doi
  36. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: Evidence from flanker tasks. doi
  37. (2003). Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance. doi
  38. (1999). Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness. doi
  39. (2004). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioral and functional imaging procedures. doi
  40. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. doi
  41. (1995). Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotion. doi
  42. (2007). Preattentive face processing: What do visual search experiments with schematic faces tell us? doi
  43. (2005). Preview search and contextual cuing.61 doi
  44. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. doi
  45. (1989). Probing “pop-out”: Another look at the face-in-the-crowd effect. doi
  46. (2008). Resisting change: The influence of luminance changes on visual marking and the preview benefit. doi
  47. (1996). Response and habituation of the human amygdala during visual processing of facial expression. doi
  48. (2001). Salience from feature contrast: Variations with texture density. doi
  49. (2000). Selective attention and cognitive control: dissociating attentional functions through different types of load.
  50. (2008). Stimulusdriven and strategic neural responses to fearful and happy facial expressions in humans. doi
  51. (2001). Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: Holistic and part-based processes. doi
  52. (2002). The Amygdala Response to Emotional Stimuli: doi
  53. (1996). The emotional brain. doi
  54. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. doi
  55. (1973). The meaningfulness and meaning of schematic faces. doi
  56. (2003). The processing of emotional facial expression is gate by spatial attention: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. doi
  57. (1988). The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. doi
  58. (1992). The role of attention in different visual search tasks. doi
  59. (2003). The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces. doi
  60. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. doi
  61. (2006). The time course of preview search with color-defined, not luminance-defined, stimuli. doi
  62. (2003). Time course and specificity of event-related potentials to emotional expressions. doi
  63. (2005). Understanding the recognition of facial idenitity and facial expression. doi
  64. (2007). Visual marking and change detection. doi
  65. (2002). Visual marking and visual change. doi
  66. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. doi
  67. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature based inhibition in selection. doi
  68. (1997). Visual Marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. doi
  69. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. doi
  70. (2005). Visual Marking: The effects of irrelevant changes on preview search. doi
  71. (2003). Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. doi
  72. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect? doi
  73. (2003). When a reappearance is old news: Visual marking survives occlusion. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.