Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The state, law and workers' participation policies in Zambia, 1969-1989 : a study of the origins and development of law and participation policy in a developing country

By Ernest Muketoi Beele

Abstract

This thesis is a study of the origins and development of\ud law and workers' participation policies in Zambia from their\ud inception in 1969 to 1989. The research was focussed at three\ud levels of investigation: why was workers' participation\ud introduced; what factors have determined its development; and\ud whether the results suggest that state involvement, and the\ud use of law in particular, has made a useful contribution to\ud these industrial relations policies.\ud The value of the work is threefold. First, it makes a\ud modest but significant contribution to the understanding of\ud law and industrial relations in post-independence Zambia.\ud Second, it disputes and, in large measure, seeks to contradict\ud earlier explanations thought to have determined the origins\ud and development of participation policies in the country.\ud Third, it provides original insights into the 1971 and 1988\ud workers' participation legislation.\ud The methods of investigation have been largely historical\ud and comparative. It analysed primary and secondary materials,\ud supplemented by discussion interviews. Theoretical guidance\ud was drawn from critical studies of corporations, labour law\ud and industrial relations.\ud The study reveals that the origins of workers' participation\ud in Zambia is connected to the political objective in the 1960s\ud of assuring the participation of Zambians in the ownership and\ud management of the economy. Consequently, it argues that the\ud development of these policies is best understood in the\ud context of this origin as well as of the structures and\ud institutions upon which they were erected in the 1970s.\ud Turning to the assessment, it found that very little\ud industrial relations effects have been demonstrated. This was\ud partly a result of three interlocking factors. First, weak and\ud inconsistent laws. Second, the failure to develop the widest\ud possible consensus on participation policies. Third, the\ud absence of economic and political conditions under which the\ud confidence of managers and workers could be won towards state\ud policies

Topics: HD, KN
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:4119

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1986). PUBLICATIONS AND REPORTS Department of Employment and Industrial Relations (Australia), Industrial Democracy and Employee Participation: A Policy Discussion Paper, doi
  2. (1981). Participation: Practices and Attitudes in
  3. (1978). Industrial Democracy and Participation: A Scottish Survey,
  4. (1977). Report of the Committee of Inquiry on Industrial Democracy doi
  5. (1977). Recommendations of the Workshop doi
  6. (1982). Report on the Two-Day Workshop on the role of Employers and Managers in the implementation of Workers' participation in Decision-making in Zambia,
  7. (1982). Report on the Three-Day Copperbelt Province Workshop on the -409- role of Employers and Managers in the implementation of workers' Participation in decision-making in Zambia,
  8. (1984). Report on the Five-Day IPD/ILO National Workshop on Workers' Participation,
  9. (1986). Report on the Seminar on Workers' Participation at Board Level,
  10. (1983). Organisation, Technical Memorandum to the Government of the Republic of Zambia on a mission to advise on the functioning of the works council system ( The Weiss Memorandum),
  11. (1989). The Profile of the Ministry of Labour, Social Development and Culture,
  12. (1990). The Rights of Labour,
  13. (1986). Kanduza, Ackson, The Political Economy of Underdevelopment in
  14. (1978). Industrial Democracy and the EEC Company Law: A Review of the Draft Fifth Directive', doi
  15. (1984). Employment Protection Laws: The Swedish Model', doi
  16. (1978). Middle class Politics in Zambia',
  17. (1980). Workers' Participation in the

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.