Predictors and survival impact of false-negative sentinel nodes in melanoma

Abstract

Background: The status of the sentinel lymph node in melanoma is an important prognostic factor. The clinical predictors and implications of false-negative (FN) biopsy remain debatable. Methods: We compared patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) [true positive (TP)] and negative SNB with and without regional recurrence [FN, true negative (TN)] from our prospective institutional database. Results: Among 2986 patients (84 FN, 494 TP, and 2408 TN; median follow-up 93\ua0months), the incidence of FN-SNB was 2.8\ua0%. While calculated FN rate was 14.5\ua0% [84 FN/(494 TP\ua0+\ua084 FN)\ua0×\ua0100], when we accounted for local/in-transit recurrence (LITR) this rate was 8.5\ua0% [46 FN/(494 TP\ua0+\ua046 FN)\ua0×\ua0100\ua0%]. On multivariate analysis, male gender (OR 2.0, 95\ua0% CI 1.1–3.6, p\ua0=\ua00.018), head/neck primaries (OR 2.5, 95\ua0% CI 1.3–4.8, p\ua

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

UQ eSpace (University of Queensland)

redirect
Last time updated on 04/08/2016

This paper was published in UQ eSpace (University of Queensland).

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.