Location of Repository

Dissociation between appearance and location within visuo-spatial working memory

By Stephen Darling, Sergio Sala and Robert H. Logie

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated separation between systems supporting memory for appearance and memory for location. However, the interpretation of these results is complicated by a confound occurring because of the simultaneous presentation of objects in multiple-item arrays when assessing memory for appearance and the sequential presentation of items when assessing memory for location. This paper reports an experiment in which sequential or simultaneous modes of presentation were factorially manipulated with memory for visual appearance or memory for location. Spatial interference (tapping) or visual interference (dynamic visual noise) were presented during retention. Appearance versus location interacted with the type of interference task, but mode of presentation did not. These results are consistent with the view that different subsystems within visuo-spatial working memory support memory for appearance and memory for location. © 2008 The Experimental Psychology Society

Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:698

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2007). Binding of what and where during working memory maintenance. doi
  2. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms of visual memories and visual images. doi
  3. (2001). Development of memory for pattern and path: Further evidence for the fractionation of visuospatial memory. doi
  4. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. doi
  5. (1997). Dissociation of visual and spatial processing in working memory. doi
  6. (2004). Double dissociations in visual and spatial shortterm memory.
  7. (2005). Dynamic visual noise: No interference with visual short-term memory or the construction of visual images. doi
  8. (1999). Effects of visual similarity on serial report and item recognition. doi
  9. (2007). Executive processes in visual and spatial working memory tasks. doi
  10. (2002). Insensitivity of visual short-term memory to irrelevant visual information. doi
  11. (2006). Neuropsychological evidence for separating components of visuo–spatial working memory. doi
  12. (1996). Object and spatial visual working memory activate separate neural systems in human cortex. doi
  13. (1999). Pattern span: a tool for unwelding visuo-spatial memory. doi
  14. (2005). Serial position memory in the visuo-spatial domain: Reconstructing sequences of unfamiliar faces. doi
  15. (2003). Spatial and visual working memory: a mental workspace. In: doi
  16. (2003). Spatio-temporal working-memory and short-term object-location tasks use different memory mechanisms, doi
  17. (1997). The inner eye and the inner scribe of visuospatial working memory: evidence from developmental fractionation. doi
  18. (2002). The irrelevant picture effect in visuo-spatial working memory: Fact or fiction?
  19. (1995). The Visual Brain In Action. doi
  20. (1982). Two cortical visual systems.
  21. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In
  22. (2003). Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences. doi
  23. (1991). Visuo-spatial working memory: visual, spatial or central executive? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.