Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Testifying in the Special Court for Sierra Leone: witness perceptions of safety and emotional welfare

By Rebecca Horn, Saleem Vahidy and Simon Charters

Abstract

This paper describes the experience of those who have testified in the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL), particularly in terms of the impact on witness security and emotional welfare. The SCSL is an international war crimes tribunal located in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Testifying in such a court has the potential to negatively impact on witnesses' personal security, and their emotional, social and economic well-being. Therefore, the SCSL has a number of measures in place to protect witnesses, and to ensure they are not negatively affected by testifying. One hundred and seventy-one witnesses who had completed their testimony were interviewed. Their responses indicate that witnesses do not feel less safe as a result of their involvement with the SCSL, and that they become less worried as their familiarity with the Court and its processes increases. Aspects of the SCSL's work with witnesses that particularly contribute to their well-being are identified, along with aspects of the service which could be modified or improved

Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:1213

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). A critique of seven assumptions behind psychological trauma programmes in war-affected areas Social Science and Medicine, doi
  2. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. doi
  3. (2004). Benefit or Burden: Victims’ Reflections on TRC Participation. Peace And Conflict: doi
  4. (2004). Evaluating Ecological Mental Health Interventions in Refugee Communities.
  5. (2004). Narrative and healing in the hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. doi
  6. (1998). Perceptions of Psychosocial Healing and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. Peace and Conflict: doi
  7. (2007). Project on International Courts and Tribunals (PICT) Inter-Agency Standing Committee [IASC]
  8. (1990). Testimony as ritual and evidence in psychotherapy for political refugees doi
  9. (2003). The Mental Health of Crime Victims: Impact of Legal Intervention. doi
  10. (2008). The pitfalls of psychosocial evaluations: a critical perspective from a field worker Intervention, doi
  11. (2001). The Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa: relation to psychiatric status and forgiveness among survivors of human rights abuses. doi
  12. (2005). The Witnesses. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.