Location of Repository

Public engagement in global context: Understanding the UK shift towards dialogue and deliberation

By Oliver Escobar

Abstract

This paper attempts to contextualise the public engagement agenda in the UK. It is an\ud introductory review of literature on citizen participation, deliberative democracy and dialogue\ud studies, as well as of key policy statements and initiatives globally and in the UK.\ud Let me explain the motivation behind this simplified synthesis of such a vast field. The more I\ud speak to public engagement practitioners the more I realise that there is a remarkable\ud disconnection between different areas of practice. For instance, those who work in the area\ud of science public engagement often ignore the wealth of expertise available in other fields\ud (i.e. local community engagement). Those who work in community engagement, for\ud instance, ignore what researchers and practitioners of deliberative democracy are doing.\ud You get the picture; there is a remarkable disconnection between fields that could work in\ud synergy. This situation creates missed opportunities. Public engagement practitioners face\ud similar challenges and often struggle without knowing that sometimes they may be trying to\ud reinvent the wheel. For instance, science engagement practitioners currently face normative\ud dilemmas that have been already addressed by deliberative scholars (i.e. inclusion;\ud legitimacy).\ud Accordingly, this review introduces the broad context of public engagement by outlining key\ud theoretical debates, as well as drawing global and UK trends in terms of policy ad practice. It\ud should serve as an invitation to further reading (thus the exhaustive referencing), but also as\ud a quick introduction that connects diverse areas of public engagement, inscribing them into\ud their wider context, namely, democratic practice in the 21st century

Publisher: Centre For Dialogue, Queen Margaret University
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:2230

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002). (2005c) National standards for community engagement, Scottish Executive and COSLA http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Built-Environment/regeneration/engage/standards
  2. (2001). An inquiry into dialogue, its challenges and justifications‟, doi
  3. (2005). Beyond the ballot. 57 Democratic innovations from around the world, A report for The POWER Inquiry.
  4. (2009). Brochure: Certificate Programme in Public Participation, Accessed on 11/03/10 http://www.workwithus.org/CampaignHelper/EmailLinkRedirect.aspx?param=q7z8rbLTiDrlTK53ia Vm08zcVWrWIevN
  5. (2001). Citizens as partners. Information, consultation and participation in policy-making, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  6. (2004). Citizens Jury handbook, The Jefferson Center http://www.jeffersoncenter.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={50312803-2164-47E3-BC01-BC67AAFEA22E}
  7. (2000). Citizens, Experts and the Environment. The Politics of Local Knowledge, Durham/London: doi
  8. (2005). Civic participation in public policymaking: a literature review, Scottish Executive,
  9. (2008). Civil society and the state”, in doi
  10. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: governance through dialogue‟, in Hajer, Maarten A. & Hendrik Wagenaar, (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society, doi
  11. (1996). Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracyz, in Benhabib, Seyla (Ed.), Democracy and difference,
  12. (2008). Communities in control: real people, real power, White Paper presented to the Parliament by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.
  13. (2004). Critical organizational dialogue, in doi
  14. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance‟, doi
  15. (2002). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Liberals, critics, contestations, doi
  16. (2003). Deliberative Democratic Theory‟,
  17. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society, doi
  18. (1996). Democracy and disagreement, doi
  19. (2009). Democracy and expertise. Reorienting public policy, doi
  20. (2008). Democratising engagement. What the UK can learn from international experience,
  21. (2008). Democratising the policy process”, in doi
  22. (2009). Democratization as deliberative capacity building”, doi
  23. (2007). Dewey’s critical pragmatism, doi
  24. (2010). Dialogue: Innovation in science policy making and the discourse of engagement, doi
  25. (2004). Dialogue. Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, doi
  26. (2001). Encouraging community dialog: approach, promise and tensions”, doi
  27. (2003). Engaging communication in conflict. Systemic practice, doi
  28. (2004). Evaluation of people’s panels and juries in social inclusion partnerships, Scottish Executive,
  29. (2006). Fostering dialogue across divides. A nuts and bolts guide from the Public Conversations Project, Watertown: Public Conversations Project.
  30. (2009). Governance: an ‘empty signifier’”, doi
  31. (2002). Guidance on enhancing public participation – full report, Department for Communities and Local Government. www.communities.gov.uk DH
  32. (2002). Inclusion and democracy, doi
  33. Involving people and communities. A brief guide to the NHS duties to involve and report on consultation,
  34. (2005). Isaacs; and The World Café Community
  35. (2006). It was such a handy term: Management fashions and pragmatic ambiguity”, doi
  36. (1999). Justice, inclusion, and deliberative democracy‟, doi
  37. (2005). Lonely citizens. Report of the working party on active citizenship, Institute for Public Policy Research.
  38. (2008). Machines, markets and morals: The new politics of a democratic NHS,
  39. (2006). Making a difference: A guide to evaluating public participation in central government,
  40. (2008). Mind the gap: Opening open an inclusive policy making. An issues paper, Public Governance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  41. (2002). Moments of meeting. Buber, Rogers, and the potential for public dialogue, doi
  42. (2002). New democratic processes. Better decisions, stronger democracy, London: Institute for Public Policy Research / EMPHASIS.
  43. OECD (2001b) Citizens as partners. OECD handbook on information, consultation and public participation in policy-making, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  44. OECD (2001c) Engaging citizens in policy-making: Information, consultation and public participation, Public Management Policy Brief No.10, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Centre ᅠfor ᅠDialogue ᅠ(QMU), ᅠWorking ᅠPaper ᅠ1, ᅠ2010 ᅠ ᅠ ᅠ
  45. OECD (2003a) Open government. Fostering dialogue with civil society, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  46. OECD (2003c) Engaging citizens online for better policy making. A policy brief, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  47. (2007). Participation and engagement in politics and policy making. Building a bridge between Europe and its citizens, Scottish Executive,
  48. (1998). Participation works! 21 techniques of community participation for the 21st century, New Economics Foundation.
  49. (2003). Participatory democracy versus elitist democracy. Lessons from Brazil, doi
  50. (2006). Participatory governance as deliberative empowerment: The cultural politics of discursive space”, doi
  51. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed, doi
  52. (2006). Perspectives on participation and citizenship”, doi
  53. (2006). Planning for effective participation. Student manual, International Association for Public Participation.
  54. (2008). Political communication and deliberation, Thousand Oaks/London: doi
  55. (2006). Power to the people. The report of Power: An independent inquiry into Britain’s democracy, The centenary project of the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust and the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust,The POWER Inquiry http://www.powerinquiry.org/report/index.php
  56. (2007). Power, participation and political renewal. Case studies in public participation, doi
  57. Promise and problems of e-democracy. Challenges of online engagement, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  58. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation”, The American Review of Public Administration, doi
  59. (1996). Public deliberation. Pluralism, complexity, and democracy, doi
  60. (2001). Public dialogue and participatory democracy. The Cupertino Community Project,
  61. (2000). Public dialogue: a tool for citizen engagement. A manual for federal departments and agencies, Centre for Public Dialogue & Canadian Policy Research Networks.
  62. (2008). Real involvement. Working with people to improve health services,
  63. (2007). Rethinking democratic deliberation: The limits and potential of citizens participation’, doi
  64. (2004). Science dialogues. The communicative properties of science and technology dialogue,
  65. Taking a communication perspective on dialogue, in doi
  66. (2009). The Australian Citizens` Parliament: a world first‟,
  67. (2009). The dialogic turn: dialogue for deliberation”,
  68. (2005). The empirical study of deliberative democracy: setting a research agenda’, doi
  69. (2006). The Next Form of Democracy. doi
  70. (2004). The NHS improvement plan. Putting people at the heart of public services,
  71. (2002). The practice of deliberative democracy: a study of 16 deliberative organizations‟, doi
  72. (1991). The public and its problems, doi
  73. (2005). The public value of science. Or how to ensure that science really matters,
  74. (1986). The theory of communicative action: Reason and rationalisation of society. doi
  75. (1989). The theory of communicative action: The critique of functionalist reason. doi
  76. (1994). The World Bank and participation. doi
  77. (2007). Towards a sociology of deliberation”,
  78. (2004). Towards participatory governance: assessing the transformative possibilities”, in
  79. (2002). Viewfinder: A policy maker’s guide to public involvement, Cabinet Office,
  80. W.(2001).The Public Dialogue Consortium’s school-wide dialogue process: a communication approach to develop citizenship skills and enhance school climate, doi
  81. (2001). What's in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions. doi
  82. (2004). Why deliberative democracy?, doi
  83. (2003). Working and learning together to build stronger communities, Scottish Executive, Edinburgh http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/02/18793/32157 Hope, Steven and Susan King

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.