Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Controversies in gynaecologic endoscopic surgery

By A.M.M. Darwish

Abstract

Despite the widespread utilization of assisted reproductive techniques in recent years, hysteroscopic as well as laparoscopic surgery should be firstly offered for patients with adnexal and uterine lesions desiring fertility. Permanent correction of the patient’s problem with frequent chances of pregnancy is a definite advantage of endoscopic surgery over assisted reproductive techniques. Reconstructive endoscopic procedures could be performed for fertile women as well e.g. hysteroscopic or laparoscopic myomectomy for abnormal bleeding. The concept of reconstruction following microsurgical principles coupled with refinement of instrumentation and techniques would improve the results of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approaches. This thesis contains many chapters on some controversial practical aspects of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic surgery. The results are discussed in the context of the evidence-based studies on similar conditions

Topics: Geneeskunde, Geneeskunde(GENK), hysteroscopy, laproscopy, reconstructive surgery, septate uterus, submucous myoma, hydrosalpnix, polycystic ovaries, ectopic pregnancy, emergencies, misoprostol
Publisher: Utrecht University
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.library.uu.nl:1874/34338
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://dspace.library.uu.nl:80... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.