While argumentation-based negotiation has been accepted as
a promising alternative to game-theoretic or heuristic based negotiation,
no evidence has been provided to con¯rm this theoretical advantage. We
propose a model of bilateral negotiation extending a simple monotonic
concession protocol by allowing the agents to exchange information about
their underlying interests and possible alternatives to achieve them during
the negotiation. We present an empirical study that demonstrates
(through simulation) the advantages of this interest-based negotiation
approach over the more classic monotonic concession approach to negotiation
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.