Among those addressed by Putnam’s model-theoretic argument it is common opinion
that the argument is invalid because question-begging. If the standard analysis
of the argument is along the right lines, then what has been called the ‘just more
theory move’ is to be held responsible for this. In the present paper, an alternative
reading of Putnam’s argument is offered that makes the ‘just more theory move’
come out perfectly legitimate, and the argument as a whole valid
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.