Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Exploring Perceptions of Presentation Formats: Antecedents and Consequences

By Daniela Rudloff


The literature review establishes that perceptions of information presented in different formats differ significantly. In addition, the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) presents a plausible framework for the impact of presentation formats on attitudes as a potential consequence. The first study presents participants with different presentation formats (text graphical, text numerical, text only) and compares perceived and actual processing as a prerequisite for attitude change. Results show a link between processing and attitude certainty but no link between format and processing can be established. Study 2 expands on the measurement of attitude and measures perceived and actual attitude change. The manipulation of involvement is unsuccessful, and participants’ perceptions of the three different types of format show no significant difference. Study 3 employs estimated and actual recall as more objective measures and observes a significant difference in participants’ estimates of other people’s recall depending on the format they had been presented with but a lack of difference in actual recall. Study 4 examines potential antecedents of the perception of formats and explores the issue of self/other perception in the context of 16 different scenarios. The study finds significant self/other differences in the perception of effectiveness of statistics; however, a factor analysis of participants’ responses fails to provide an explanation for the split of scenarios with and without a difference; Need for Cognition cannot be established as a potential antecedent. Study 5 successfully demonstrates a difference in perception of the three formats employed, but offers no support for subject background as a possible antecedent. Drawing on this, Study 6 examines whether this difference in perception leads to an observable difference in task performance but is unsuccessful in eliciting an effect. The discussion examines implications of the findings and discusses possible limitations of the methodology

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2012
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2008). 10). Climate change. Retrieved 1.10.2008, from
  2. (2005). 4. In a recent survey with NGO (non governmental organisation) members, Appendix K:
  3. (2007). A meta-analysis of the effects of presenting treatment benefits in different formats. doi
  4. (2008). A new look at the consequences of attitude certainty: The amplification hypothesis. doi
  5. (1992). Absolutely relative: How research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. doi
  6. (2005). Affect, risk and decision making. doi
  7. (1998). Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages. doi
  8. (1997). All cues are not created equal: Obtaining attitude persistence under low-involvement conditions. doi
  9. (1971). Attitude change, commitment, and ego involvement. doi
  10. (2005). Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. doi
  11. (1935). Attitudes. In
  12. (2002). Background beliefs in Bayesian inference. doi
  13. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. doi
  14. (2009). Beyond attitude consensus: The social context of persuasion and resistance. doi
  15. (1971). Channel variation and attitude change. doi
  16. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. doi
  17. (2000). Communicating statistical information. doi
  18. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. doi
  19. (1994). Comparative judgments of numerical and verbal attribute labels. doi
  20. (1997). Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta-analysis. doi
  21. (1974). Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. doi
  22. (2007). Conclusion explicitness in message communication: The roles of NFC and knowledge in attitude formation. doi
  23. (2009). Concrete and abstract visualisations in history learning tasks. doi
  24. (2005). Dissonance and importance: Attitude change effects of personal relevance and race of the beneficiary of a counterattitudinal advocacy. doi
  25. (1998). Does evidence presentation format affect judgment? An experimental evaluation of displays of data for judgments. doi
  26. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. doi
  27. (1997). Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior. doi
  28. (1994). Effects of presentation order and communication modality on recall and attitude. doi
  29. (2007). Effects of statistical information on decision-making.
  30. (2008). Emerging perspectives on the structure and function of attitude strength. doi
  31. (1977). Evidence for a self-serving bias in the attribution of causality. doi
  32. (1977). Factors affecting the effectiveness of abstract versus concrete information. doi
  33. (1977). Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion. doi
  34. (2006). Formats for improving risk communication in medical tradeoff decisions. doi
  35. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision doi
  36. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. doi
  37. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. doi
  38. (1992). How does motivation moderate the impact of central and peripheral processing on brand attitudes and intentions? doi
  39. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. doi
  40. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. doi
  41. (2007). Impact of presentation format on accuracy and confidence in decision-making. Presentation at the
  42. (2007). Impact of statistical information on confidence and accuracy in decision-making: A placebo effect? Mathematical Thinking: An Interdisciplinary Workshop,
  43. (2007). Impact of statistics on decision-making.
  44. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. doi
  45. (1999). Lake wobegon be gone! The ’below-average effect’ and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. doi
  46. (1994). Message order effects in persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. doi
  47. (2003). Messages influencing college women’s tanning bed use: Statistical versus narrative evidence format and a selfassessment to increase perceived susceptibility. doi
  48. (2004). Minority versus majority influence and uncertainty orientation: Processing persuasive messages on the basis of situational expectancies. doi
  49. (2004). Modeling patient decision-making: The role of base-rate and anecdotal information. doi
  50. (1993). Mood and the formation of attitudes. doi
  51. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: Independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. doi
  52. (1982). On the study of statistical intuitions. doi
  53. (2000). Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions. doi
  54. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-thanaverage effect. doi
  55. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. doi
  56. (2009). Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: The case of prenatal screening. doi
  57. (1996). Presentation format in analogue studies: Effects on participants’ evaluations. doi
  58. (1996). Processing of numerical and verbal product information. doi
  59. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. doi
  60. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of board of scientific affairs’ advisory group on the conduct of research on the internet. doi
  61. (1988). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In doi
  62. (1974). Repetition of highly similar messages and attitude change. doi
  63. (2000). Representation of numerical and verbal product information in consumer memory. doi
  64. (2004). Right about others, wrong about ourselves? Actual and perceived self-other differences in resistance to persuasion. doi
  65. (2010). Risk communication in clinical trials: A cognitive experiment and a survey. doi
  66. (2005). Risk comprehension and judgment of statistical evidentiary appeals. When a picture is not worth a thousand words. doi
  67. (1992). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Classical conditioning is more effective when prior knowledge about the attitude stimulus is low than high. doi
  68. (1993). Self-enhancement and superiority biases in social comparison. doi
  69. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. doi
  70. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? a comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. doi
  71. (1991). Some dynamic properties of attitude structures: Context-induced response facilitation and polarization. doi
  72. (1975). Some effects of initial attitude importance on attitude change. doi
  73. (1982). Stalking the elusive ’vividness’ effect. doi
  74. (1947). The behavior of attitudes. doi
  75. (1993). The dynamics of persuasion.
  76. (2009). The effect of graphics on environmental health risk beliefs, emotions, behavioural intentions, and recall. doi
  77. (2007). The effects of argument quality and involvement type on attitude formation and attitude change: A test of dual-process and social judgment predictions. doi
  78. (1991). The effects of graphical versus numerical response on the accuracy of graph-based forecasts. doi
  79. (1980). The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. doi
  80. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. doi
  81. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. doi
  82. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion doi
  83. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. doi
  84. (1982). The impact of enriching case and statistical information on consumer judgments. doi
  85. (2008). The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. doi
  86. (2008). The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. doi
  87. (1982). The need for cognition. doi
  88. (1991). The psychology of attitude change and social influence.
  89. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: doi
  90. (1996). The psychology of good judgment: Frequency formats and simple algorithms. doi
  91. (2008). The role of amount, cognitive elaboration, and structural consistency of attitude-relevant knowledge in the formation of attitude certainty. doi
  92. (2007). The role of information presentation formats in belief updating. doi
  93. (2008). Transparency in risk communication: Graphical and analog tools. In doi
  94. (2003). Uncertainty orientation in the group context: Categorization effects on persuasive message processing. doi
  95. (2006). Understanding knowledge effects on attitude-behavior consistency: The role of relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge. doi
  96. (2005). Understanding the results of medical tests: Why the representation of statistical information matters. In
  97. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. doi
  98. (1981). Vaccine-preventable diseases and immunization. Retrieved 27.04.2010, from
  99. (1996). Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. doi
  100. (2010). Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Does format presentation of probabilistic information regarding breast cancer screening affect women’s comprehension? doi
  101. (1990). Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox. doi
  102. (1993). Vividness can undermine the persuasiveness of messages. doi
  103. (2008). Wash at 30 ◦ and make a difference. Retrieved 10.09.2008, from do_good_turn/do_good_turn.php
  104. (2004). What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials.
  105. (2008). What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. doi
  106. (2002). Which statistical formats facilitate what decisions? The perception and influence of different statistical information formats. doi
  107. (2010). Who profits from visual aids: Overcoming challenges in people’s understanding of risks. doi
  108. (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, doi
  109. (1996). Working knowledge, cognitive processing, and attitudes: On the determinants of bias. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.