Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Fractions: A Piece of Cake? An Exploration of Student Teachers’ Understanding, Attitudes and Beliefs in Relation to Fractions

By Helen Fielding

Abstract

The title of this study shows the aims on which the research questions were based. These included the areas in which the student teachers felt confident as well as those they perceived to be more difficult. This study adopted a\ud phenomenographic approach in order to provide further insight into each student teacher’s subject knowledge. The purpose of this study was to discover the individual and distinct ways in which student teachers understood fractions.\ud The study was undertaken in two universities with a group of thirteen undergraduate and postgraduate Initial Teacher Education students. The creation of a comfortable, supportive working atmosphere and the use of self-selected small groups, enabled a range of rich and honestly reflective data to be collected. Observations were made of groups working on two collaborative tasks involving the sequencing of fractions by magnitude and finding, followed by diagnostic interviews. Each interview was structured by the student’s individual selections from a range of questions where they indicated which they felt were most and least accessible. A constructivist perspective was adopted where the students had the opportunity to reconstruct their own understanding of fractions through the explanation and discussion of their existing ideas.\ud A range of successful strategies was demonstrated, especially the use of mathematical anchors as a means of comparison and the use of residual or gap thinking to consider differences in magnitude. Improper fractions and\ud reunitising were difficulties cited by many in the group. A certain level of anxiety and lack of flexibility in their chosen approaches was evident with the common assumption that there was a particular method which should be adopted; this was usually based on their “secondary school” experiences

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2012
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/10121

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). 10 Practical Tips for Making Fractions Come Alive and Make Sense.
  2. (1986). 7.13 Initial Codes Generated from the First Level of the Data Analysis 7.14 Revised Attitudinal Codes
  3. (1990). Accessing Educational Effectiveness. The focus group interview as a technique for data collection.
  4. (2005). Adding it up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics.
  5. (2000). Adult Mathematical Thinking and Emotions - A Study of Numerate Practices.
  6. (2008). Advisory Panel Report (USA)
  7. (2002). an Emotional Response to Doing Mathematics as an Adult and a Teacher.
  8. (2003). An Investigation into the Mathematical Knowledge of Pre-service Primary Teachers.
  9. (1994). Analysing Qualitative Data .
  10. (2009). Aspects of a Teacher’s Mathematical Knowledge in a Lesson on Fractions.
  11. Briggs M.(1999) "Building and Assessing Subject Knowledge in Mathematics for Pre-service Students."
  12. (2001). British Research into initial and Continuing Professional Development of Teachers in
  13. (2003). Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. 2nd Edition London: Sage Denzin,N.
  14. (1987). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis,
  15. (1992). Curriculum Organisation and Classroom Practice in Primary Schools.
  16. (2002). Developing Mathematics Teaching and Teachers A Research Monograph.
  17. (2003). Developing Primary Mathematics Teaching. Sage: London Ryan
  18. DfEE(1998) Teaching :High Status ,High Standards. Requirements for Initial Teacher Training .
  19. (2003). Diagnosis and Prescription : Some Common Maths Problems.
  20. (2003). DIY Fraction Pack.
  21. (2003). Do Real Life Situations Help Sixth Graders Understand the Meaning of Multiplication of Fractions? MSc thesis,
  22. (2000). Does “Part-whole Concept” Understanding Correlate with Success in Basic Math Classes ? Proceeds of Adults learning Mathematics,
  23. (1991). Doing Qualitative Research: Circles within Circles. London:
  24. (2000). Doing Quantitative Research. London: Sage
  25. (2007). Drawing on a Theoretical Model to Study Students’ Understandings of Fractions.
  26. (1994). Duality, Ambiguity and Flexibility: a Proceptual View of Simple Arithmetic,
  27. (1998). Effectiveness of a Mathematics Methods Course in Reducing Math Anxiety of Preservice Elementary Teachers. School Science and Mathematics.Vol.98 (3) March Tsao,Y.L.(
  28. (2004). Empowering Andrea to help Year 5 Students Construct Fraction Understanding.
  29. (1995). Factors Associated With Types of Mathematical Anxiety in College Students.
  30. (2009). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement
  31. (2009). Filling in the Gaps: Creating an Online Tutor for Fractions Carnegie Mellon University Research Showcase (Honors thesis) Hammett B.
  32. (2008). Fractions, Decimals, and Rational Numbers Report requested by Learning Processes Task Group of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel (NMP), 7.7 Observed Task 2 cards (in correct order).
  33. (2003). Fractions, Percentages, Decimals, Ratio and Proportion. A Key Stage 3 teaching pack London: DfEE
  34. From Quotient Fields to Recursive Understanding in
  35. (2002). G.(2007) Learning for Life in the 21st Century : Sociocultural Perspectives on the Future of Education ??? Westwell L,J.
  36. (2000). Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods'.
  37. (1990). Halves, Pieces and Twoths: Constructing and Using Representational Contexts into Teaching Fractions. In
  38. (2009). Handling Qualitative Data. London :Sage Roulston,
  39. (1995). Hedges in Mathematics Talk: Linguistic Pointers to Uncertainty
  40. (2001). How To Research 2nd ed. Maidenhead :
  41. (2009). Human Brain has Neurons Devoted to Fractions. New Scientist Vol.201 part:
  42. (2007). I would Rather Die”: Attitudes of 16 Year Olds Towards Their Future Participation in Mathematics .
  43. (1987). in Science and Mathematics. An Educational Approach. Dortrecht: D.Reidel Fraenkel,
  44. (1996). Insights into Teaching Mathematics.
  45. (1991). Intermediate Teachers' Knowledge of Rational Number Concepts. In
  46. (2008). Issues raised by Testing Trainee Primary Teachers’
  47. (1999). It ain't (just) what you do: Effective Teachers of Numeracy in Thompson, I.
  48. (1999). Learners Understanding of the addition of Fractions.
  49. (2003). Learning for Mathematical Insight: a Longitudinal Comparative Study on Modelling Learning and Instruction.
  50. (1993). Learning Rational Numbers with Understanding : The Case of Informal Knowledge .
  51. (2008). Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Teacher Efficacy in Elementary Pre-service Teachers',
  52. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance.
  53. (2009). Mathematics Anxiety in Preservice Teachers: Its Relationship to their Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Fractions.
  54. (1995). Mathematics Education: Erlbaum Hove Ernest P.
  55. (1997). Mathematics Teaching in the Early Years: An Investigation of Teachers’ Subject Knowledge.
  56. (1988). Mental computation and number comparison: Their roles
  57. (1998). Mind the Gaps: Primary Teacher Trainees’ Subject Knowledge in E. Bills (Ed.)
  58. (1996). O.(1994) Children learning Mathematics, A Teacher’s guide to recent research.
  59. (1991). On the Dual Nature of Mathematical Conceptions :Reflections on
  60. (2000). Perspectives on Adults Learning Mathematics.
  61. (1995). Perspectives on Learning to Teach. Knowledge Base for Teacher Educators.
  62. (1996). Phenomenography and Children's Experience of division. In
  63. (2001). Presenting and Representing: From Fractions to Rational Numbers.
  64. (1999). Primary Student Teachers' Understanding of Mathematics and its Teaching.
  65. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods: 3rd Ed
  66. (2002). Qualitative Research and the Question of Rigor. Qualitative Health research,
  67. (1991). R.(1994) The Hard-pressed Researcher Harlow: Longman
  68. (1993). Rational Number, An Integration of Research,
  69. (1993). Rational Number, An Integration of Research, London: Erlbaum Martin, T,
  70. (1992). Rational number, ratio and proportion.
  71. (2007). Read me First for a Users Guide to Qualitative Methods (2nd Ed) London :Sage.
  72. (1999). Relating Fractions & Decimals: Listening to Student Talk.
  73. (2003). Relational, Instrumental and Creative Understanding.
  74. (2010). Research Methods for Education.
  75. (2003). Research Methods in Education. London : Routledge Falmer
  76. (2004). Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Researchers,
  77. S.(2005) Never getting to zero: Elementary school students’ understanding of the indivisibility of number and matter.
  78. (2000). Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality,
  79. (1988). Social and Motivational Bases for Understanding in
  80. (2008). Some Advice for Making the Teaching of Fractions a Research-based, Practical, Effective and Enjoyable Experience in the middle years http://gippslandtandlcoaches.wikispaces.com/file/detail/fractions.pdf -
  81. (2002). Standards at Key Stage 2 in English, mathematics and scienceA report for Head teachers, class teachers and assessment co-coordinators on the 2002 curriculum assessment for 11 year olds.
  82. (2002). Student Teacher’s Understanding of Rational Number; Part-whole and Numerical Constructs. Papers of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics
  83. (2003). Student Teachers, Mental Arithmetic and the Numeracy Skills Tests.
  84. (2005). Subject Knowledge and Pedagogical Knowledge. Where will the next generation of UK mathematicians come from?
  85. (1992). Success and Failure
  86. (2005). Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of
  87. (2002). Teaching Common Fractions in Primary School : The Australian Association for Research
  88. Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers.
  89. (2002). Teaching Fractions: New Method, New resources .The Clearing House . Eric Digest
  90. (2003). The decidable and Undecidable in Mathematics Education.
  91. (2004). The Effects of Laboratory –Based Learning on Developmental Mathematics Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Rational Numbers. Ed D dissertation –
  92. (2009). The Elephant in the Classroom: Helping Children Learn and Love Maths.
  93. (2000). The Mathematical Brain. London: Macmillan Buxton,
  94. (1990). The Mathematical Understandings That Prospective Teachers Bring to Teacher Education.
  95. (2008). The Role of Representation in Fraction Addition and Subtraction
  96. (1996). Theories of Mathematical Learning , New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
  97. (1984). Understanding Equivalent Fractions in
  98. (2006). Using QSR NVivo within Doctoral Research: Presentation at Reflections on Processes ESRC Methods Festival: Can Software Enhance the Quality of Qualitative Research?
  99. (2002). Why are Fractions Difficult? The Mathematical Association London
  100. Why do we have to do this?” Primary Trainee Teachers’ views of a subject knowledge audit in mathematics.
  101. (2010). Why Maths Education isn't Working for All Pupils- Children giving up on maths. ‘Special’ NASEN- January2010 Edition Clarke,
  102. (2004). Why You Have to Probe to Discover What Year 8 Students Really Think About Fractions www.merga.net.au/documents/RP512004.pdf (last accessed 28/06/2011)

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.