Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Accuracy of cDNA microarray methods to detect small gene expression changes induced by neuregulin on breast epithelial cells

By Bin Yao, Sanjay N Rakhade, Qunfang Li, Sharlin Ahmed, Raul Krauss, Sorin Draghici and Jeffrey A Loeb

Abstract

BACKGROUND: cDNA microarrays are a powerful means to screen for biologically relevant gene expression changes, but are often limited by their ability to detect small changes accurately due to "noise" from random and systematic errors. While experimental designs and statistical analysis methods have been proposed to reduce these errors, few studies have tested their accuracy and ability to identify small, but biologically important, changes. Here, we have compared two cDNA microarray experimental design methods with northern blot confirmation to reveal changes in gene expression that could contribute to the early antiproliferative effects of neuregulin on MCF10AT human breast epithelial cells. RESULTS: We performed parallel experiments on identical samples using a dye-swap design with ANOVA and an experimental design that excludes systematic biases by "correcting" experimental/control hybridization ratios with control/control hybridizations on a spot-by-spot basis. We refer to this approach as the "control correction method" (CCM). Using replicate arrays, we identified a decrease in proliferation genes and an increase in differentiation genes. Using an arbitrary cut-off of 1.7-fold and p values <0.05, we identified a total of 32 differentially expressed genes, 9 with the dye-swap method, 18 with the CCM, and 5 genes with both methods. 23 of these 32 genes were subsequently verified by northern blotting. Most of these were <2-fold changes. While the dye-swap method (using either ANOVA or Bayesian analysis) detected a smaller number of genes (14–16) compared to the CCM (46), it was more accurate (89–92% vs. 75%). Compared to the northern blot results, for most genes, the microarray results underestimated the fold change, implicating the importance of detecting these small changes. CONCLUSIONS: We validated two experimental design paradigms for cDNA microarray experiments capable of detecting small (<2-fold) changes in gene expression with excellent fidelity that revealed potentially important genes associated with the anti-proliferative effects of neuregulin on MCF10AT breast epithelial cells

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2004
DOI identifier: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-99
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:509237
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001). AD: A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t-test and statistical inferences of gene changes. Bioinformatics
  2. (2001). Churchill GA: Statistical design and the analysis of gene expression microarray data. Genet Res
  3. (2003). Data Analysis Tools for DNA Microarrays.
  4. (2002). Design issues for cDNA microarray experiments. Nat Rev Genet
  5. (2002). DL: Bayesian analysis of gene expression levels: statistical quantification of relative mRNA level across multiple strains or treatments. Genome Biol
  6. (2000). Estimating the posterior probability of differential gene expression from microarray data.
  7. (2001). Experimental design, analysis of variance and slide quality assessment in gene expression arrays. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel
  8. (1997). Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science
  9. (1997). Fischbach GD: Neurotrophic factors increase neuregulin expression in embryonic ventral spinal cord neurons.
  10. (2000). FR: Progression of premalignant MCF10AT generates heterogeneous malignant variants with characteristic histologic types and immunohistochemical markers. Breast Cancer Res Treat
  11. (2002). Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet
  12. (2001). G: The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet
  13. (2000). GA: Analysis of variance for gene expression microarray data.
  14. (2003). Getzoff ED: Identification of a new cryptochrome class. Structure, function, and evolution. Mol Cell
  15. (2000). Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations.
  16. (1998). JK: Transcriptional activation of functional endogenous estrogen receptor gene expression in MCF10AT cells: a model for early breast cancer.
  17. (2001). Neuregulin-heparan-sulfate proteoglycan interactions produce sustained erbB receptor activation required for the induction of acetylcholine receptors in muscle.
  18. (2001). On differential variability of expression ratios: improving statistical inference about gene expression changes from microarray data.
  19. (2004). Resolution of large and small differences in gene expression using models for the Bayesian analysis of gene expression levels and spotted DNA microarrays.
  20. (2001). RS: Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models.
  21. (1996). RW: Parallel human genome analysis: microarray-based expression monitoring of 1000 genes.
  22. (2002). Sealfon SC: Accuracy and calibration of commercial oligonucleotide and custom cDNA microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res
  23. (2000). SH: Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell
  24. (2001). Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response.
  25. (2002). Statistical intelligence: effective analysis of highdensity microarray data. Drug Discov Today
  26. (2002). Statistical issues with microarrays: processing and analysis. Trends Genet
  27. (2000). Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments.
  28. (2002). The limit fold change model: A practical approach for selecting differentially expressed genes from microarray data.
  29. (2002). Tibshirani R: Empirical bayes methods and false discovery rates for microarrays. Genet Epidemiol
  30. (2002). TP: Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res
  31. (2002). Trent JM: Ratio statistics of gene expression levels and applications to microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics
  32. (2001). Wong WH: Issues in cDNA microarray analysis: quality filtering, channel normalization, models of variations and assessment of gene effects.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.