Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Comparison of the sensitivity of three methods for the rapid identification of Cryptococcus neoformans.

By J Cohen

Abstract

The sensitivity of three methods for the rapid identification of Cryptococcus neoformans was compared. These were: direct microscopy of india ink preparations, acridine orange staining followed by fluorescence microscopy and detection of cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen by latex agglutination. The overall limit of detection was 3.5 +/- 5.4 X 10(3) CFU/ml (mean +/- SD, n = 27). When different strains were studied, no single method was consistently superior. False positive results were rare (two of 162 observations, 1.2%) but there were eight false negatives (4.9%), five of which were with acridine orange. Tests such as these are an invaluable aid in the rapid diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis but they cannot be relied upon to detect low grade infections

Topics: Research Article
Year: 1984
DOI identifier: 10.1136/jcp.37.3.332
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:498710
Provided by: PubMed Central
Sorry, our data provider has not provided any external links therefore we are unable to provide a link to the full text.

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.