Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

International perspectives on intensive care at the end-of-life: the futility movement seems alive and well

By J Randall Curtis
Topics: Book Report
Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2002
DOI identifier: 10.1186/cc1859
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:420075
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1990). AR: Medical futility: Its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med
  2. (1996). AR: Medical futility: response to critiques. Ann Intern Med
  3. (2002). DF: Three Patients: International Perspectives on Intensive Care at the End of Life.
  4. (1999). Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med
  5. (1991). Society. Withholding and withdrawing lifesustaining therapy.
  6. (1995). Streiner DL: Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. JAMA
  7. (1997). The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine: Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable tratments. Crit Care Med
  8. (1989). The illusion of futility in clinical practice.
  9. (2002). The medical futility debate: patient choice, physician obligation, and end-of-life care.
  10. (2000). The rise and fall of the futility movement.
  11. (1995). Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. JAMA

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.