Article thumbnail

Conceptualizing the Complexity of Change in Psychotherapy: The Case of "Cora"

By Margrethe Seeger Halvorsen, John McLeod, Kirsten Benum and Hanne Haavind

Abstract

In this article we respond to the commentaries by Altman and Miller (2016), Bohart (2016), and Timulak and Keogh (2016) on our case of Cora, which involved over 121 psychotherapy sessions with a client with a history of severe relational trauma that had led to difficulty in forming close relationships, as well as a series of suicide attempts (Halvorsen, Benum, Haavind, McLeod, 2016). The commentaries differ in their view of the value of Coras case, interpretations of the material, and methodological preferences. Together the commentaries illustrate the complexity of change in psychotherapy, how we need multifaceted approaches to understand change, and the challenges in writing up a case in this context. We call for further dialogue within the psychotherapy research community around the nature and implications of methodological choices arising from the conduct of case study research in this field

Topics: case study; clinical case study; mixed method; complexity of change; psychotherapy; courage; theory-building case; symbolic objects in psychotherapy
Publisher: 'Rutgers University Libraries'
Year: 2016
DOI identifier: 10.14713/pcsp.v12i3.1979
OAI identifier: oai:journals.libraries.rutgers.edu:article/1979
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://pcsp.libraries.rutgers... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.