Location of Repository

Class, gender and chance: the social division of welfare and occupational pensions in the United Kingdom

By Traute Meyer and Paul Bridgen

Abstract

The social division of welfare literature emphasises the extent to which occupational-pension provision is distributed on the basis of class and gender. As most previous commentators have at least implicitly recognised, however, a significant proportion of less advantaged people are covered. This paper argues that the patterns of access and their distributional consequences must be considered more systematically, and that in this context, the diversity of employers’ pension schemes are investigated. When this is done, it emerges that in the United Kingdom, the spread of occupational provision beyond the most privileged workers means that some vulnerable individuals avoid poverty in retirement. At the same time, however, the main determinant of which less advantaged people are covered and which not is chance. While class and gender are important predictors of who receives occupational pensions, access for the disadvantaged arises mainly as an accident of an employment decision made for reasons unrelated to savings or pensions criteria. This paper argues that the implication is that unsustainable justice-based arguments are currently used by policy makers to sanction the current distribution of UK pension incomes. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of the findings for the appropriateness of recent UK policy proposals and for international debates about pension reform

Topics: HQ, HT, HV
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:156409
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1995). A disaster foretold? The case of personal pensions. doi
  2. (2005). A New Pensions Settlement for the Twenty-first Century: The Second Report of the Pensions Commission. Pensions Commission, London. Available online at http://www.pensionscommission.org.uk/publications/ [Accessed
  3. (1973). A Theory of Justice. doi
  4. (2007). Address for correspondence: Traute Meyer and Paul Bridgen, Division of Sociology and Social Policy, School of Social Sciences, doi
  5. (1978). Analyses in the social division of welfare. doi
  6. (2006). Analytic Classes and Operational Categories and Sub-categories of NS-SEC. Office of National Statistics, London. Available online at http://www.statistics.
  7. (2006). Available online at http://www.dwp.gov.uk/pensionsreform/pdfs/ white_paper_complete.pdf [Accessed
  8. (2006). Available online at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/13/46/7090927.pdf [Accessed
  9. (1987). Being poor: perceptions and coping strategies of lone mothers. In
  10. (2006). Broadcasting Company 2005. Deal on Public Sector Pensions. News broadcast, 18 October. Available online at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4353444.stm [Accessed
  11. (1999). Changing patterns of pension inequality: the shift from state to private sources. doi
  12. (1989). Class and the elderly.
  13. (1998). Comparative social policy research in Europe.
  14. (2004). Confederation of British Industry (CBI) and Mercer Human Consulting
  15. (2003). Debate on social justice and pension reform. doi
  16. (2000). Does it matter what type of pension you have? doi
  17. (2003). Employers and the management of retirement. doi
  18. (2004). Finding work in 2001: urban-rural contrasts across England in employment rates and local job availability. doi
  19. (2003). Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics. doi
  20. (2001). Firms and the welfare state: when, why, and how does social policy matter to employers? In doi
  21. (1995). Foundation doi
  22. (1991). Gender, class and income inequalities in later life. doi
  23. (2003). Gender, Pensions and the Life Course: How Pensions Need to Adapt to Changing Family Forms. doi
  24. (2004). Human Resources Services
  25. Income Data Services 2003. Pensions in Practice 2003/04. From Primary Legislation to Practical Implementation.
  26. (1999). Increasing Compulsory Pension Provision: Attitudes of the General Public and the Self-Employed. Stationery Office,
  27. (2003). Individual Choice in Social Protection: The Case of Switzerland. Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper 11, OECD, doi
  28. (1997). Inequality in the UK.
  29. (1986). Inventing Retirement. doi
  30. (1999). Markets and motives: implications for welfare. doi
  31. (1997). Meritocratic equality of opportunity: economic efficiency, social justice, or both? doi
  32. (1991). Modern Political Thought. doi
  33. (1989). Money and Marriage. doi
  34. (2003). Occupational Pension Schemes 2000: Eleventh Survey doi
  35. (2005). Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) doi
  36. (2006). Pension challenges and pension reforms in OECD countries. doi
  37. (2000). Pension exclusion in grey capitalism: mapping the pension gap in Britain. doi
  38. (1993). Pension penalties: the gendered division of occupational welfare. doi
  39. (2004). Pension politics in three small states: Denmark, Sweden and The Netherlands. doi
  40. (1994). Pensions Law Reform.
  41. (2004). Pensions: Challenges and Choices: The First Report of the Pensions Commission. Stationery Office, doi
  42. (2006). Post Industrial Welfare States.
  43. (2001). Post-industrial pressures on mature welfare states. doi
  44. (2005). Prepared for Retirement? The Adequacy and Distribution of Retirement Resources doi
  45. (2002). Private pension planning: the rhetoric of responsibility, the reality of insecurity. doi
  46. (2005). Private Pensions and Social Inclusion: The Dutch Case in Comparative Perspective. Paper presented at the ESPAnet conference,
  47. (2007). Private Pensions versus Social Inclusion? Non-state Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe. Edward Elgar, doi
  48. (2007). Private pensions versus social inclusion? Three patterns of provision and their impact. In doi
  49. (2003). Ruralities and gender divisions of labour in Eastern England. doi
  50. (2006). Security in Retirement: Towards a New Pensions System. doi
  51. (2002). Simplicity, Security and Choice: Working and Saving for Retirement. Cm5677, Stationery Office,
  52. (1998). Social Security (DSS)
  53. Social Security 1999. The Changing Welfare State. Opportunity for All: Tackling Poverty and Social Exclusion.
  54. (1999). Socio-demographic change, policy impacts and outcomes in social Europe.
  55. (2001). Thatcher’s children’. Pensions and retirement: some survey evidence. doi
  56. The 2004. A Fairer Future. News article,
  57. The 2004a. Businesses Consider Swapping Pensions for Cash. National news section,
  58. The 2004b. Expert sees Public Sector Pension Gap. National news section, 21 May. Financial Times,
  59. (2006). The 2006. Black hole in public pensions is £81 billion. 27 February. Available online at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/ 02/27/npens27.xml [Accessed
  60. (1996). The Beveridge straightjacket: policy formation and the problem of poverty in old age. doi
  61. (1997). The British case. In
  62. (2000). The determinants of job seekers’ reputation perceptions. doi
  63. (1999). The division of welfare and UK occupational pensions 377Bennett,
  64. (2001). The division of welfare and UK occupational pensions 379Mayhew, V.
  65. (2002). The implications of the ‘new insurance contract’ for UK pension provision: rights, responsibilities and risks. doi
  66. (2000). The Politics of Pension Reform: Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe. doi
  67. (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare States. doi
  68. (2004). The privatization of retirement income? Variation and trends in the income packages of old-age pensioners. doi
  69. (1997). The Promise of Private Pensions: The First Hundred Years. doi
  70. (1994). The role of pensions in the labor market: a survey of the literature. doi
  71. (2000). The Swiss Multi-pillar Pension System: Triumph of Common Sense? World Bank, doi
  72. (1999). The third way for pensions (by way of Thatcherism and avoiding today’s pensioners).
  73. (2003). The world turned upside down: below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. doi
  74. (2002). Towards a new role for occupational pensions in continental Europe: elements and techniques of solidarity used within funded occupational pension schemes.
  75. (1996). Unequal but Fair: A Study of Class Barriers
  76. (2003). Welfare retrenchment or collective responsibility? The privatisation of public pensions doi
  77. (1997). What Price Security?
  78. (2005). When do benevolent capitalists change their mind? Explaining the retrenchment of defined benefit pensions in Britain. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.