Location of Repository

A pre-post test evaluation of the impact of the PELICAN MDT-TME Development Programme on the working lives of colorectal cancer team members

By Cath Taylor, Joanna M. Sippitt, Gary Collins, Chris McManus, Alison Richardson, Jeremy Dawson, Michael Richards and Amanda J. Ramirez

Abstract

Background: the PELICAN Multidisciplinary Team Total Mesorectal Excision (MDT-TME) Development Programme aimed to improve clinical outcomes for rectal cancer by educating colorectal cancer teams in precision surgery and related aspects of multidisciplinary care. The Programme reached almost all colorectal cancer teams across England. We took the opportunity to assess the impact of participating in this novel team-based Development Programme on the working lives of colorectal cancer team members.<br/><br/>Methods: the impact of participating in the programme on team members' self-reported job stress, job satisfaction and team performance was assessed in a pre-post course study. 333/568 (59%) team members, from the 75 multidisciplinary teams who attended the final year of the Programme, completed questionnaires pre-course, and 6-8 weeks post-course.<br/><br/>Results: across all team members, the main sources of job satisfaction related to working in multidisciplinary teams; whilst feeling overloaded was the main source of job stress. Surgeons and clinical nurse specialists reported higher levels of job satisfaction than team members who do not provide direct patient care, whilst MDT coordinators reported the lowest levels of job satisfaction and job stress. Both job stress and satisfaction decreased after participating in the Programme for all team members. There was a small improvement in team performance.<br/><br/>Conclusions: participation in the Development Programme had a mixed impact on the working lives of team members in the immediate aftermath of attending. The decrease in team members' job stress may reflect the improved knowledge and skills conferred by the Programme. The decrease in job satisfaction may be the consequence of being unable to apply these skills immediately in clinical practice because of a lack of required infrastructure and/or equipment. In addition, whilst the Programme raised awareness of the challenges of teamworking, a greater focus on tackling these issues may have improved working lives furthe

Topics: RC0254
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:159503
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2003). A snapshot of MDT working and patient mapping in the UK colorectal cancer centres in 2002. Colorectal Disease doi
  2. (2008). A: Mapping the English cancer clinical nurse specialist workforce. Cancer Nursing Practice doi
  3. (2005). A: Socrates phase II study results: capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin and preoperative radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
  4. (2009). AJ: Multidisciplinary team members' views about MDT working: results from a survey commissioned by the National Cancer Action Team.
  5. (2005). Aston Team Performance Inventory.
  6. (2006). D: MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?
  7. (2008). Department of Health: High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. Department of Health, doi
  8. Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2002, 359:650-56. T a b l e : I m p a c t o f p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n t h e doi
  9. (2006). Group: Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ doi
  10. (2008). Hospital Consultants' Job Stress and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Available from: http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/iopweb/blob/downloads/locator/l_370_HCJSSQ_ Manual.pdf).
  11. (2007). MJ: Results of a survey of the role of multidisciplinary team coordinators for colorectal cancer in England and Wales. Colorectal Disease doi
  12. (2010). National Cancer Action Team: The characteristics of an effective multidisciplinary team. National Cancer Action Team, doi
  13. (2007). National MDT-TME Development Programme: changes to clinical practice. Available from: admin@pelicancancer.org;
  14. (2008). Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncology doi
  15. (2005). Ramirez AJ: Changes in mental health of UK hospital consultants since the mid-1990s. Lancet doi
  16. (2010). Ramirez AJ: Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ doi
  17. (2005). Role development and effective practice in specialist and advanced practice roles in acute hospital settings: systematic review and meta-synthesis. doi
  18. (2005). Royal College of Nursing: Maxi Nurses. Advanced and Specialist Nursing Roles: Results from a survey of RCN members in advanced and specialist nursing roles. Royal College of Nursing,
  19. (2003). Sainsbury R: Breast Cancer Teams: The impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness.
  20. (2007). Stress and burnout among colorectal surgeons and colorectal nurse specialists working in the National Health Service. Colorectal Disease doi
  21. (2003). Training and quality assurance for rectal cancer: 20 years of data is enough. Lancet Oncology doi
  22. (1996). WM: Mental health of hospital consultants: The effects of stress and satisfaction at work. Lancet doi
  23. (2007). Working with the team: strategies employed by hospital cancer nurse specialists to implement their role. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.