Article thumbnail

Development and Validation of SEER (Seeking, Engaging with and Evaluating Research): A Measure of Policymakers\u27 Capacity to Engage with and Use Research. Copyright: Creative Commons License.

By S E Brennan, J E F McKenzie, T Turner, S Redman, S Makkar, A Williamson, A Haynes and S E Green

Abstract

Full text in Additional File 2 on website. BACKGROUND: Capacity building strategies are widely used to increase the use of research in policy development. However, a lack of well-validated measures for policy contexts has hampered efforts to identify priorities for capacity building and to evaluate the impact of strategies. We aimed to address this gap by developing SEER (Seeking, Engaging with and Evaluating Research), a self-report measure of individual policymakers\u27 capacity to engage with and use research. METHODS: We used the SPIRIT Action Framework to identify pertinent domains and guide development of items for measuring each domain. Scales covered (1) individual capacity to use research (confidence in using research, value placed on research, individual perceptions of the value their organisation places on research, supporting tools and systems), (2) actions taken to engage with research and researchers, and (3) use of research to inform policy (extent and type of research use). A sample of policymakers engaged in health policy development provided data to examine scale reliability (internal consistency, test-retest) and validity (relation to measures of similar concepts, relation to a measure of intention to use research, internal structure of the individual capacity scales). RESULTS: Response rates were 55% (150/272 people, 12 agencies) for the validity and internal consistency analyses, and 54% (57/105 people, 9 agencies) for test-retest reliability. The individual capacity scales demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability (alpha coefficients \u3e 0.7, all four scales) and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients \u3e 0.7 for three scales and 0.59 for fourth scale). Scores on individual capacity scales converged as predicted with measures of similar concepts (moderate correlations of \u3e 0.4), and confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence that the scales measured related but distinct concepts. Items in each of these four scales related as predicted to concepts in the measurement model derived from the SPIRIT Action Framework. Evidence about the reliability and validity of the research engagement actions and research use scales was equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: Initial testing of SEER suggests that the four individual capacity scales may be used in policy settings to examine current capacity and identify areas for capacity building. The relation between capacity, research engagement actions and research use requires further investigation

Publisher: Washington University Open Scholarship
Year: 2017
DOI identifier: 10.1186/s12961-016-0162-8
OAI identifier: oai:openscholarship.wustl.edu:bsltests-4965
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://health-policy-systems.... (external link)
  • https://openscholarship.wustl.... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.