Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

2009, Multi-period forecasts of volatility: Direct, iterated, and mixed-data approaches, Discussion Paper

By Eric Ghysels, Antonio Rubia and Rossen Valkanov


Multi-period forecasts of stock market return volatilities are often used in asset pricing, portfolio allocation, risk-management and most other areas of finance where longhorizon measures of risk are necessary. Yet, very little is known about how to forecast volatility several periods ahead, as most of the focus has been on one-period-ahead forecasts. In this paper, we compare several approaches of producing multi-period ahead forecasts of volatility – iterated, direct, and mixed-data sampling (MIDAS) – as alternatives to the often-used “scaling ” method. The comparison is conducted (pseudo) out-of-sample using returns data of the US stock market portfolio and a cross section of size, book-to-market, and industry portfolios. The results are surprisingly sharp. For the market and all other portfolios, we obtain the same ordering of the volatility forecasting methods. The direct approach provides the worse (in MSFE sense) forecasts; it is dominated even by the naive scaling method. Iterated forecasts are suitable for shorter horizons (5 to 10 days ahead), but their MSFEs deteriorate rapidly as the horizon increases. The MIDAS forecasts perform well at long horizons

Year: 2013
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.