Location of Repository

A Qualitative Comparison of the Suitability of Four Theorem Provers for Basic Auction Theory ⋆

By Christoph Lange, Marco B. Caminati, Manfred Kerber, Till Mossakowski, Colin Rowat, Makarius Wenzel and Wolfgang Windsteiger

Abstract

Novel auction schemes are constantly being designed. Their design has significant consequences for the allocation of goods and the revenues generated. But how to tell whether a new design has the desired properties, such as efficiency, i.e. allocating goods to those bidders who value them most? We say: by formal, machine-checked proofs. We investigated the suitability of the Isabelle, Theorema, Mizar, and Hets/CASL/ TPTP theorem provers for reproducing a key result of auction theory: Vickrey’s 1961 theorem on the properties of second-price auctions. Based on our formalisation experience, taking an auction designer’s perspective, we give recommendations on what system to use for formalising auctions, and outline further steps towards a complete auction theory toolbox

Year: 2013
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.359.9238
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • http://www.risc.jku.at/publica... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.