From the text: “In my paper, Theorem 5.2 is incorrect, as pointed out to me by Henning Krause. In the proof of that theorem, I asserted that ‘the composition fα is proved to be an isomorphism ’ by Neeman. In fact, the map Neeman used is not fα, so the argument is incorrect. A counterexample to Theorem 5.2, along with a corrected version, is provided by Krause in [Math. Ann. 340 (2008), no. 4, 733–747; MR2372735 (2008m:13017)].” Reference
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.