Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Employment trajectories and later employment outcomes for mothers in the British Household Panel Survey: an analysis by skill level

By Kitty Stewart


Maternal employment formed a central plank in the former Labour Government’s strategy to reduce child poverty. Even where potential jobs were low-skilled and low-paid, policy was explicitly work (rather than training) first, and lone parents in particular were given direct and indirect financial subsidies to enter employment of any kind. The explicit assumption was that a low-paid job would be a stepping-stone to better things. From 2008 a little more stick was introduced to what had been a largely carrot-based approach to encouraging employment, a shift that has continued under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Government in power from May 2010. However, there is little evidence in practice that a low-paid job when one’s child is young is a reliable route to improved future prospects. This paper uses the British Household Panel Survey to explore this issue further. It examines the employment trajectories of 929 women for the ten years after the birth of their youngest child, asking two main questions. Do mothers tend to remain in employment once they have taken a job? And do wages and other employment outcomes further down the line (when their youngest child is ten) reflect the employment pathway taken? In both cases the paper focuses in particular on differences between women with higher and lower levels of qualifications. The paper finds mothers following a variety of employment pathways, with instability much more common than steady work trajectories. One in three mothers moves in and out of work over the decade after the birth of their youngest child, and this is true for both lower-skilled and higher-skilled mothers. Stable work histories do appear to carry benefits in terms of wages when the youngest reaches ten, but the benefits are substantially higher for women with higher levels of qualifications, as might be predicted by human capital theory. More highly qualified women who moved in and out of work over the decade had an hourly wage at ten which was 33% lower than similar women with a stable work history; for women with few or no qualifications the corresponding figure was 14%. Levels of occupational progression as measured by change in NS-SEC status over the decade were encouraging, but for both higher and lower skilled women job satisfaction when the youngest is ten appears unrelated to the pathway taken

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor, HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2011
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). Children and Career Interruptions: The Family Gap doi
  2. (2006). Differences in Wage Growth by Education Level: Do Less Educated Workers Gain Less from Work Experience”.
  3. (2009). Early Childcare and Child Development.” doi
  4. (2001). Educational Attainment and Family Gaps in Women‟s Wages: Evidence from Five Industrialized Countries”. Luxembourg, Luxembourg Income Study Waldfogel,
  5. (2009). Employment and Wage Trajectories for Mothers Entering LowSkilled Work: Evidence from the British Lone Parent Cohort.” Social Policy and doi
  6. (1995). Employment Prospects of Welfare Recipients”. The Work Alternative: Welfare Reform and the Realities of the doi
  7. (1998). Explaining Rising Wage Inequality: Explorations with a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of Labor Earnings with Heterogeneous Agents.” doi
  8. (2011). forthcoming) “A route out of poverty? Mothers‟ employment and wages in the Families and Children Study”. London, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion,
  9. (2004). Lone Parents Cycling Between Benefits and Work. London, Department for Work and Pensions.
  10. (2006). Lone parents cycling in and out of benefits”. Staying On, Stepping Up:How Can Employment Retention and Advancement Policies Be Made to Work for Lone Parents?
  11. (1999). Low Pay Dynamics and Transition Probabilities.” doi
  12. (1999). Measuring Wage Growth Among Former Welfare Recipients”. Working Paper Series.
  13. (2007). Motherhood and women‟s earnings in Anglo-American, doi
  14. (2002). Skill-Biased Technological Change and Rising Wage Inequality: Some Problems and Puzzles.” doi
  15. (1999). Tackling Poverty and Extending Opportunity. doi
  16. (2003). The „Mincer Equation‟ Thirty Years After: Schooling, Experience and Earnings”. Jacob Mincer: doi
  17. (1997). The effect of children on women‟s wages.” doi
  18. (2005). The effects of a mother‟s return to work decision on child development in the UK.” doi
  19. (1995). The Effects of Intermittent Labor Force Attachment on Women‟s Earnings.” Monthly Labor Review 118(September):
  20. (1998). The Family Gap for Young Women in the United States and Britain: Can Maternity Leave Make a Difference.” doi
  21. (2003). The family gap in pay: Evidence from seven industrialized countries.” doi
  22. (2009). The Mommy Track Divides: The Impact of Childbearing on Wages of Women of Differing Skill Levels”. doi
  23. (2005). The Motherhood Wage Gap for Women in the United States: The Importance of College and Fertility Delay.” doi
  24. (2003). The Motherhood Wage Penalty Revisited: Experience, Heterogeneity, Work Effort and Work-Schedule Flexibility.” doi
  25. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood.” doi
  26. (1998). The wages of motherhood: better or worse?”
  27. (2000). Trends doi
  28. (2003). Wage Trajectories of Workers in Poor Households: The National Experience”. Paper presented by Peter Gottschalk at the CASE Social Exclusion seminar, London School of Economics,
  29. (2009). Welfare Reform and Lone Parents in doi
  30. (2008). Work is good for you: lone mothers, children, work and wellbeing”. Third Annual KELA lecture, The Social Insurance Institution,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.