Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Trust and early years childcare: parents’ relationships with private, state and third sector providers in England

By Jonathan Roberts

Abstract

Relationships of trust are central to the provision of public services. There are, however, concerns that public service reform may disrupt established trust relations. One such reform is the provision of services by a mix of organisations from state, for-profit and third sectors. This paper reports upon an empirical study of the trust relationships between parents and diverse organisations providing early years childcare. It considers whether organisational form or sector is perceived to be a significant indicator of trustworthiness or untrustworthiness, and examines organisational behaviours which may support or hinder trusting relationships. The paper reports that a priori signals, such as sector, have little effect on decisions to trust. Instead, parents actively construct trust through observation of and interactions with providers. Attention therefore shifts to trust-producing organisational behaviours, such as transparency, and to trust-reducing behaviours, such as staff turnover. The paper identifies some benefit in provision through an integrated centre, where parents develop trust over time prior to preschool childcare use. Such a process may be particularly helpful to parents who face disadvantage

Topics: H Social Sciences (General), HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1017/S0047279411000225
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:40797
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). (c.21), London: HMSO, available at: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/ acts2006/pdf/ukpga_20060021_en.pdf, last accessed 20 December
  2. (2006). A Code of Practice on the Provision of Free Nursery Education Places for Threeand Four-Year-Olds, available at http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/publications/ 0/1747/, last accessed 20
  3. (2001). A market in love? Choosing pre-school childcare’, doi
  4. (1996). Altruism, nonprofits and economic theory’,
  5. (2007). Assessing the capacity of pension institutions to build and sustain trust: a multidimensional conceptual framework’, doi
  6. (2006). Childcare and Early Years Provision: A Study of Parents’ Use, Views and Experience, DfES Research Report RR723,L o n d o n : National Centre for Social Research/DfES.
  7. (2008). Childcare, choice and social class: caring for young children in the UK’, doi
  8. Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) (2009a), Next Steps for Early Learning and Childcare: Building on the 10-Year Strategy,N o t t i n g h a m
  9. (2009). Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) (2009b), Provision for Children under Five Years of Age in
  10. (2004). Decline of the Public,
  11. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships’, doi
  12. (2003). Developing early years childcare in England, 1997–2002: the choices for (working) mothers’, doi
  13. (2006). Education and Skills doi
  14. (1994). Ethics in nonprofit management: creating a culture of integrity’,
  15. (1998). form:parentperceptionsversus realityin the day care industry’,
  16. (2010). Funding early years education and care: can a mixed economy of providers deliver universal high quality provision?’, doi
  17. (2006). H a r d i n ,R .( doi
  18. (2007). HM Treasury/Department for Children, Schools and Families
  19. (2002). Interpersonal trust and voluntary associations: examining three approaches’, doi
  20. (1996). Modern economic theory and the study of nonprofit organizations: why the twain shall meet’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25: 470–84.http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: doi
  21. (1993). Nonprofit organizations in the mixed economy: a d e m a n da n ds u p p l ya n a l y s i s ’ ,i nA .B e n - N e ra n dB .G u i( e d s . ) ,The Nonprofit Sector in the Mixed Economy,A n nA r b o r ,M I :M i c h i g a nU n i v e r s i t yP r e s s .
  22. Office (2007), The Future Role of the Third Sector in Social and Economic Regeneration: Final Report,
  23. (1994). Reflexive Modernization,C a m b r i d g e :P o l i t yP r e s s Hansmann,H.(1996),TheOwnershipofEnterprise,C ambridge,MA:H arvar dU ni v ersityP r ess.
  24. (2003). Risk, trust and health’, Health, Risk and doi
  25. (2005). The “childcare champion”? New Labour, social justice and the childcare market’, doi
  26. (2004). The Final Report: Effective Pre-School Education, London: Institute of Education. doi
  27. (1987). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective’, doi
  28. (2007). Tipping the balance: the problematic nature of work–life balance in a lowincome neighbourhood’, doi
  29. (1979). Trust and Power,N e wY o r k :J o h nW i l e y .
  30. (2006). Trust and welfare state reform: the example of the NHS’, doi
  31. (1963). Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care’, doi
  32. (2005). Understanding Trust from the Perspective of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism: The Interplay of Institutions and Agency, MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/13, Cologne: Max-Plank-Institut F¨ ur Gesellschaftforschung.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.