Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Comparative analysis of Indonesian and Korean governance

By Yunwon Hwang

Abstract

This paper overviews governance issues in Indonesia and Korea from a comparative perspective. To do so, the WGI (World Governance Index) developed by the World Bank is employed for a more objective and consistent comparison between the two countries. WGI consists of six dimensions of voice and accountability, political stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption. The two countries are analyzed and compared by each dimension individually. The paper also examines the operational definition of governance and the rationale of WGI before getting into the analysis of comparative governance issues for the two countries. The point of the paper is not to draw any concluding remarks or policy suggestions, but rather to examine the differences and similarities between two governance systems via a variety of governance dimensions

Topics: DS Asia, JQ Political institutions Asia
Publisher: Asia Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:38364
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). Asia Needs a New Rule-of-Law Debate, United Press International. (UPIAsia.com) Thomas,
  2. Business, Government and Development: Northeast and Southeast Asian Comparisons,
  3. (2002). Contesting 'good' Governance: Crosscultural Perspectives on Representation, Accountability and Public Space, doi
  4. Deregulation of Indonesia’s Interregional Agricultural Trade, doi
  5. (1997). From Neo-Mercantilism to Globalism: The Changing Role of the State and South Korea's Economic Prowess,
  6. Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial System,. doi
  7. Indonesia's Economic Development in comparison to South Korea and Taiwan. (http://okusi.net) Doner, R.(1991), Approaches to the Politics of Economic Growth in Southeast Asia,
  8. Indonesia’s Bureaucracy Among Worst in Asia.
  9. (1992). Industrialisation and the Economic and Political Development of Capital: The Case of Indonesia,
  10. (2007). Institutional Working Definition of Corruption, Anti-Corruption Trust of Southern Africa.(http://www.actsouthernafrica.org)
  11. (2006). Measuring Corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A Critique of the Cross-Country Indicators, World Bank Policy Research Department Working Paper 3968. doi
  12. (2006). Promoting Good Governance, Commonwealth Secretariat. Arndt, Christiane and Charles
  13. (2009). Sustainable Governance Indicators
  14. (1993). The IMF's Approach to Promoting Good Governance and Combating Corruption — A Guide,
  15. The World Competitiveness Yearbook, Switzerland.(www.imd.ch/research/publications/wcy)
  16. (1992). What is Good Governance. (http://www.unescap.org) World Bank

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.