Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Risk preferences and voluntary agri-environmental schemes: does risk aversion explain the uptake of the Rural Environment Protection Scheme?

By Xavier Vollenweider, Salvatore Di Falco and Cathal O’Donoghue

Abstract

The lowering of trade barriers under the successive reforms of the pillar I of the Common Agricultural Policy, the opening of the commodity markets to an ever greater number of financial actors and the uncertainty created by climate change, amplify both production risk and market risks for producers. This is particularly true for Irish dairy farmers, as they are export-oriented and their grass-based production system is closely linked to the cycle of seasons. The Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS), part of the agri-environmental policies of pillar II, offers to farmers an opportunity to stabilize their income over a five year period. We estimate risk preferences with the model of Antle (Antle, 1987) in order to analyse the impact of risk aversion (relative risk premium) on the probability of joining REPS. Our results support the hypothesis that REPS is used as a risk management tools. This sheds light on the interaction between the reforms of pillar I and the ones of pillar II: further increases in risk could increase the uptake of voluntary agri-environmental policies while the development of new risk management tools (revenue insurance, forward contracts, etc) could decrease it as they could both become substitutes

Topics: HD61 Risk Management, S Agriculture (General)
Publisher: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:37585
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). Are “Decoupled” Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation. doi
  2. (2010). Asymmetry, Partial Moments, and Production Risk. doi
  3. (1980). Attitudes toward Risk: Experimental Measurement in Rural India. doi
  4. (2003). Biodiversity conservation by farmers: analysis of actual and contingent participation. doi
  5. (2006). Can Risk-aversion Toward Fertilizer Explain Part of the Non-adoption Puzzle for Hybrid Maize? Empirical Evidence from Malawi. doi
  6. (2001). Connecting environmental management and farm household livelihoods: The Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland. doi
  7. (2006). Crop genetic diversity, farm productivity and the management of environmental risk in rainfed agriculture. doi
  8. (2002). Determinants of the Willingness of Belgian Farmers to Participate in Agrienvironmental Measures. doi
  9. (2003). Econometric Analysis, doi
  10. (1987). Econometric Estimation of Producers' Risk Attitudes. doi
  11. (1996). Economic Behavior Under Uncertainty: A Joint Analysis of Risk Preferences and Technology. The Review of Economics and doi
  12. (2010). Empirical Challenges for Risk Preferences and Production. doi
  13. (1997). Estimation of Moments and Production Decisions Under Uncertainty. doi
  14. (2010). Estimation of production risk and risk preference function: a nonparametric approach. doi
  15. (1954). Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk. doi
  16. (2008). Factors Affecting Farmers’ Participation in Agri-environmental Measures: A Northern Italian Perspective. doi
  17. (1997). Factors Influencing Farmer Participation in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Scheme. doi
  18. (2001). Farmer Participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes: Towards Conservation-Oriented Thinking? Sociologia Ruralis, doi
  19. (1980). Increasing Downside Risk.
  20. (1990). Interactions Between Agricultural and Environmental Policies: A Conceptual Framework.
  21. (2009). Joint Estimation of Risk Preferences and Technology: Flexible Utility or Futility? doi
  22. (1991). Joint Risk Preference-Technology Estimation with a Primal System. doi
  23. (2006). Modeling the Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy for Arable Crops under Uncertainty. doi
  24. (2009). Modelling Farmers’ Participation in an Agrienvironmental Scheme using Panel Data: An Application to the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland. doi
  25. (1999). Modelling the CAP Arable Crop Regime in Italy : Degree of decoupling and impact of Agenda
  26. (2009). Modelling the impact of the CAP Single Farm Payment on farm investment and output. Eur Rev Agric Econ, doi
  27. (1989). Nonstructural Risk Attitude Estimation. doi
  28. (2009). On Crop Biodiversity, Risk Exposure, and Food Security in the Highlands of Ethiopia. doi
  29. (1979). Production Function Estimation and Related Risk Considerations. doi
  30. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. doi
  31. (2002). Resource Management under Production and Output Price Uncertainty: Implications for Environmental Policy. doi
  32. (2002). Risk preference and productivity measurement under output price uncertainty. doi
  33. (2003). Risk Preferences, Production Risk and Firm Heterogeneity*. doi
  34. (2002). Specification and Estimation of Production Risk, Risk Preferences and Technical Efficiency. doi
  35. (1983). Testing the Stochastic Structure of Production: A Flexible Moment-Based Approach. doi
  36. (2009). The effects of EU agricultural policy changes on farmers' risk attitudes. Eur Rev Agric Econ, doi
  37. (1999). The Rural Environment Protection Scheme of the Republic of Ireland. doi
  38. (2008). The story of the moment: risk averse cypriot farmers respond to drought management. doi
  39. (2000). Using Consumption and Asset Return Data to Estimate Farmers' Time Preferences and Risk Attitudes. doi
  40. (1993). Wealth, Weather Risk and the Composition and Profitability of Agricultural Investments. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.