Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Emerging markets and climate change: Mexican standoff or low-carbon race?

By David J. Frame and Cameron Hepburn

Abstract

Schelling (1995) stressed the importance of correctly disaggregating the impacts of climate change to understand how individual interests differ across space and time. This paper considers equity implications at a level of disaggregation which we consider insightful, but which is non-standard in the literature. We consider a “three-agent” model, comprising the G20 North, the G20 emerging markets (the GEMs), and the rest of the world (ROW), and consider their impact on emissions and temperature increases to 2100. Using the MAGICC and RICE models, we calculate that simply stabilising emissions in GEMs would avoid about twice as much warming as an 80% emissions reduction in the North. We further show that decisions regarding the carbon intensity of economic development in the developing world are first order determinants of the likelihood of dangerous climate change in the coming century, and that early GEM participation in mitigation initiatives is essential if we are to safeguard the interests of the world’s most vulnerable. Finally we argue that though this three-handed strategic structure may lead to impasse, it may also stimulate a low-carbon race between nations

Topics: GE Environmental Sciences, HC Economic History and Conditions
Publisher: Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:37583
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). An Introduction to Atmospheric Physics, Cambridge: doi
  2. (2009). Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) ‘‘reasons for concern.’’ doi
  3. China overtakes the United States to become world’s largest energy consumer”, International Energy Agency,
  4. (1983). Climate Change: Implications for Welfare and Policy." In: Changing Climate: Report of the Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee.
  5. (2010). Climate-change policy: why has so little been achieved?“ doi
  6. (1988). Consequentialism and Its Critics. doi
  7. (2011). Delivering Low Carbon Growth: A Guide to China’s 12th Five Year Plan. The Climate Group and HSBC,
  8. (2003). Environment and Statecraft, doi
  9. (1997). Equality and priority', doi
  10. (2007). Ethics of the discount rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change,
  11. (2007). Global Climate Change: A Challenge to Policy," The Economists' Voice: doi
  12. (1973). Hockey Helmets, Concealed Weapons, and Daylight Saving: doi
  13. (2001). Inequality, Public Perception and the Institutional Responses to Globalisation”, Moneda y Credito, 'La Globalizacion y los Nuevos Retos de la Politica Economica',
  14. (2010). International Air Travel and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A proposal for an Adaptation Levy”, The World Economy, doi
  15. (2001). Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming. doi
  16. (2005). Migration and Rural Poverty in China," doi
  17. (2010). Profile: Dr Hu Tao”,
  18. (2010). Sizing the climate
  19. (2010). State of the Union,
  20. (2007). Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, doi
  21. (2008). The Economics of Climate Change, Richard T. Ely Lecture, American Economic Review: Papers &
  22. (2009). The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions, doi
  23. (2006). Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: A new data set from 1850”, doi
  24. (2009). Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne”, doi
  25. (2004). Weighing Lives, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.