Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Anatomy of a disaster: why some accidents are unavoidable

By John Downer

Abstract

This paper looks at the fateful 1988 fuselage failure of Aloha Airlines Flight 243 to suggest and illustrate a new perspective on the sociology of technological failure and the question of whether such failures are potentially avoidable. Drawing on core insights from the sociology of scientific knowledge, it highlights, and then challenges, a fundamental principle underlying our understanding of technological risk: idea that 'failures' always connote 'errors' and are, in principle, foreseeable. From here, it suggests a new conceptual tool for Disaster Theory, by proposing a novel category of man-made calamity: what it calls the 'Epistemic Accident'. It concludes by exploring the implications of Epistemic Accidents and sketching their relationship to broader issues concerning technology and society, and social theory's approach to failure

Topics: RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:36542
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1984). (2005)’When Airplanes Feel Fatigued’ in Flying, September. [available at http://www.flyingmag.com/article.asp?section_id=13&article_id=578&print_page=y ]
  2. (2009). (2009a) ‘Watching the Watchmaker: On Regulating the Social in Lieu of the Technical.’
  3. (1994). A rejoinder to Perrow’, doi
  4. Air Safety Week (2005) ‘Hercules Crash In Baghdad Points To Metal Fatigue In C130's Wing Center’. Air Safety Week.
  5. (2000). An Accident of History’ doi
  6. (1996). Aramis, or The Love of Technology. doi
  7. (1987). Bhopal. doi
  8. (2004). Bundesstelle für Fluguntersuchung (BFU)
  9. (1989). Bureau of Accident Investigation: ‘Aircraft Accident Report: Aloha Airlines, Flight 243, Boeing 737-200, N73711, near Maui,
  10. (1994). Causes of Disaster: doi
  11. (1992). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. doi
  12. (1985). Changing Order.
  13. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’.
  14. (1994). Collision Course: The Truth About Airline Safety. doi
  15. (1999). Comet: The World's First Jet Airliner.
  16. (1994). Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering. doi
  17. (2001). Engineer has alternate theory on plane disaster’ in USA Today. April. Available at http://www.iasa.com.au/folders/Safety_Issues/RiskManagement/alohaagain.html Turner,
  18. (1998). Foresights of Failure: An Appreciation of Barry Turner’ doi
  19. (2003). History As Cause: Challenger and Columbia’ Ch.
  20. (1991). How do we treat technical uncertainty in systems failure? The case of the space shuttle Challenger’ doi
  21. (1990). Human Error and the Problem of Causality in the Analysis of Accidents’ doi
  22. (1990). Human Error. doi
  23. (1998). Inside the Sky: A Meditation on Flight.
  24. (1990). Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Weapon Guidance. doi
  25. (1996). Knowing Machines: essays on technical change. MIT press: doi
  26. (1976). Knowledge and Social Imagery. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London/Henley/Boston. doi
  27. (1991). Large technical systems, real-life experiments, and the legitimation trap of technology assessment: the contribution of science and technology studies to constituting risk perception’ doi
  28. (1992). Lessons from Aloha’. BASI Journal, June. Available at: http://www.iasa.com.au/folders/Safety_Issues/others/lessonsfromaloha.html
  29. (1997). Man-Made Disasters (second edition).
  30. (1978). Man-Made Disasters. doi
  31. (1980). Naming and Necessity. doi
  32. (1987). New Technology and Human Error. doi
  33. (1999). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (2 nd ed.). doi
  34. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Basic Books inc: doi
  35. (1982). On the design and management of nearly error-free organizational control systems’,
  36. (1987). Organizational culture as a source of high reliability.’ doi
  37. (2005). Organizational Encounters With Risk. Cambridge: doi
  38. (2005). Organizational rituals of risk and error’ in Hutter, Bridget and Power, Michael (eds) Organizational Encounters With Risk. Cambridge: doi
  39. (2005). Restoring reason: causal narratives and political culture’ doi
  40. (1986). Risk Management and Political Culture. Russell Sage Foundation:
  41. (2006). Safety Board (NTSB) doi
  42. (1987). Science in Action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. doi
  43. (1986). Science Speaks to Power. doi
  44. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: doi
  45. (1991). Social Responses to Large Technical Systems: Control or Anticipation’ doi
  46. (1993). Testing - One, Two, Three...Testing!’: Toward a Sociology of Testing’. doi
  47. (1998). The Certainty Trough.’ in
  48. (1996). The Challenger Launch Decision. doi
  49. (1999). The Dark Side Of Organizations: Mistake, Misconduct, doi
  50. (1998). The Golem at Large: What You Should Know About Technology. doi
  51. (1993). The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science. doi
  52. (1999). The Limits of Normal Accident Theory’.
  53. (1994). The limits of safety: the enhancement of a theory of accidents’ doi
  54. (1993). The Limits of Safety. doi
  55. (1983). The Organizational Context of Human Factors Engineering’. doi
  56. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and doi
  57. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. doi
  58. (2000). The Tombstone Imperative: The Truth About Air Safety.
  59. (1992). To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design. Vintage books: doi
  60. (1989). U.S. Investigators Fault Aloha Line In
  61. (1988). Unruly technology: Practical Rules, Impractical Discourses and Public Understanding’. doi
  62. (2001). Was Three Mile Island a ‘Normal Accident’?’ doi
  63. (2007). When the Chick Hits the Fan: Representativeness and Reproducibility in Technological Testing’. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.