Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Tools of security risk management for the London 2012 Olympic Games and FIFA 2006 World Cup in Germany

By Will Jennings and Martin Lodge


Mega-events such as the Olympic Games and the football World Cup represent a special venue for the practice of risk management. This paper explores management of security risks in the case of two sporting mega-events, the London 2012 Olympic Games and the FIFA 2006 World Cup in Germany. The analysis progresses in three stages. First, it explores three explanations that have dominated the literature on policy instruments and tools and introduces the generic tools of government approach developed by Christopher Hood (1983). Second, it reviews the tools used for security risk management at the two mega-events. Third, it evaluates competing explanations of tool choice and degree to which these are consistent with organisational strategies of risk management at the events. The findings highlight the importance of national political systems in influencing tool choice

Topics: K Law (General)
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (forthcoming) ‘London 2012: the politics of critical infrastructures and organising resilience’ doi
  2. (2008). Beijing
  3. (2012). bid. (2004) Candidate file. UK Parliament.
  4. (2007). Comparative public policy’ doi
  5. (1989). Coping with crises: the management of disasters, riots and terrorism. doi
  6. (2008). Governing after crisis. Cambridge: doi
  7. (1986). Governing the economy. doi
  8. (1990). Impossible jobs in public management. doi
  9. (1989). Instruments of government: perceptions and contexts’. doi
  10. (2007). Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: reflections on the tools of government after two decades’. doi
  11. (2001). Introduction to varieties of capitalism,’ doi
  12. (2007). Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments – from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation’. doi
  13. London Olympics 2012: costs and benefits (Department of Culture, Media and Sport, Freedom of Information Request). London: ARUP/Insignia Richard Ellis.
  14. (2002). London Olympics 2012: costs and benefits.
  15. (1994). Mega-events and urban policy’, doi
  16. (2003). Mega-projects: the changing politics of urban public investment. doi
  17. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: an anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: doi
  18. (1957). Models of man: social and rational. doi
  19. (1999). Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. doi
  20. (2001). Not steering but drowning: policy catastrophes and the regulatory state’, doi
  21. (2007). Organized uncertainty: organizing a world of risk management. doi
  22. (1999). Patterns of democracies. doi
  23. (1982). Policy styles in doi
  24. (2008). Public Accounts Committee doi
  25. (2003). Public leadership in times of crisis: mission impossible?’ doi
  26. (2008). Security costs will send 2012 bill over £10bn’, Evening Standard,
  27. (1989). The definition and analysis of hallmark tourist events’. doi
  28. (2001). The government of risk. Oxford: doi
  29. (1994). The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment’.
  30. (2009). The logic of appropriateness. doi
  31. (2005). The politics of attention: how government prioritizes problems. Chicago: doi
  32. (2005). The politics of crisis management. Cambridge: doi
  33. (2002). The risk game and the blame game’. doi
  34. (2004). The risk management of everything. doi
  35. (2007). The tools of government in the digital age. doi
  36. (2002). The tools of government: a guide to the new governance. doi
  37. (1983). The tools of government. doi
  38. (2002). Underestimating costs in public works projects: error or lie?’ doi
  39. (2004). Vaulting Olympic doi
  40. (2004). Websites BBC Online Metropolitan

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.