Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Team leadership in the intensive care unit: the perspective of specialists

By Tom W. Reader, Rhona Flin and Brian H. Cuthbertson


Objectives: To identify the behaviors senior physicians (e.g., specialists, staff attendings) report using to lead multidisciplinary teams in the intensive care unit. Design: Semistructured interviews focusing on team leadership, crisis management, and development of an environment that enable effective team performance in the intensive care unit. Setting: Seven general intensive care units based in National Health Service hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants: Twenty-five senior intensive care medicine physicians. Measurements and Main Results: Responses to a semistructured interview were transcribed and subjected to “content” analysis. The interview analysis focused on references to the “functional” behaviors used by leaders to manage team performance and the “team development behaviors” used to build the conditions that enable effective team performance. Seven of the interviews were coded by a second psychologist to measure inter-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability (Cohen's κ) was acceptable for both scales (κ = 0.72 and κ = 0.75). In total, 702 functional leadership behaviors (behaviors for information gathering, planning and decision-making, managing team members) were coded as being used to manage the intensive care unit, along with 216 team development behaviors (for providing team direction and establishing team norms). These behaviors were grouped together in a theoretically driven framework of intensive care unit team leadership. Conclusions: Intensive care unit senior physicians report using a variety of leadership behaviors to ensure high levels of team performance. The data described in this study provide insight into the team leadership behaviors used by intensive care unit team leaders and have implications for the development of team leadership training and assessment tools

Topics: HD28 Management. Industrial Management, RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a4c7
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1998). A: Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. doi
  2. (2006). Do self-reported intentions predict clinicians' behaviour: a systematic review. Implement Sci
  3. Input-process-output model used to explain team performance in the ICU (12) Please see Crit Care Medicine 2009; 53:1791 for the expanded framework.
  4. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. doi
  5. (2005). Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception. The Academy of Management Review 1987; 12:250-264 64. Bradfield A, Wells G: Not the same old hindsight bias: Outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments. doi
  6. (2004). The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg 2006; 191:5-10 52. Donchin

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.