Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Three Ironies in Trust

By Geoffrey Hawthorn

Abstract

some of the time. An extreme instance <<112>> would be many of the motives that a parent has towards his or her child. A more ordinary instance would be the motives we have for others whom we just like. But as Williams explains, such motives cannot either analytically or practically do the work for a more extensive and properly social or political trust that we might wish them to do. This is because the four reality conditions that have to be met - that people know what each others motives actually are, that they know that they know, that this knowledge is not too expensive to obtain and maintain, and that the outcomes of any course of action are not too difficult and themselves too expensive to determine - are separately and together conditions that reality can never meet. If this is correct then the common and, on the face of it, uncontentiously common-sensical claim that the less information we have, the more interpersonal trust we need, is at once sensible and insufficient. It i

Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.23.4358
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.