Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Creative destruction and copyright protection: regulatory responses to file-sharing

By Bart Cammaerts and Bingchun Meng


The DEA gets the balance between copyright enforcement and innovation wrong. The use of peer-to-peer technology should be encouraged to promote innovative applications. Focusing on efforts to suppress the use of technological advances and toprotect out-of-date business models will stifle innovation in this industry.Providing user-friendly, hassle-free solutions to enable users to download music legally at a reasonable price, is a much more effective strategy for enforcing copyright than a heavy-handed legislative and regulatory regime. Decline in the sales of physical copies of recorded music cannot be attributed solely to file-sharing, but should be explained by a combination of factors such as changing patterns in music consumption, decreasing disposable household incomes for leisure products and increasing sales of digital content through online platforms

Topics: HE Transportation and Communications, KD England and Wales, QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science, T201 Patents. Trademarks
Publisher: Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2011
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2011b) The hegemonic copyright-regime vs. the sharing copyright users of music?. doi
  2. (2010). Adding up the UK music industry for
  3. (2007). Criminalising Copyright: A Story of Publishers, Pirates and Pieces of Eight. The Cambridge Law doi
  4. (2005). Cyber Trust and Crime Prevention’.
  5. (2011). Digital Music Report
  6. (2010). East End Tech City Speech,
  7. (2007). Exploring the Networked Worlds of Popular Music: Milieu Cultures. doi
  8. (2009). Family Spending A report on the 2008 Living Costs and Food Survey. Basingstoke/Newport: Palgrave Macmillan/ONS.
  9. (2006). File Sharing: Creative Destruction of Just Plain Destruction, doi
  10. (2004). Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. doi
  11. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy, doi
  12. (2007). Hacking Capitalism: The Free and Open Source Software Movement, doi
  13. (2010). IFPI (2010b) Recorded Industry in Numbers
  14. (2011). London: The Leading Question/Music Ally: Cammaerts, Bart and Meng, Bingchun
  15. (2006). Measuring the effect of file sharing on music purchases, doi
  16. (2006). Piracy on the High C’s: Music Downloading, Sales Displacement, and Social Welfare in a Sample of College Students. doi
  17. (2004). Policy Project: Media policy brief 1 Creative destruction and copyright protection
  18. (1992). Producing Pop: Culture and conflict in the popular music industry. doi
  19. (2003). Quentin Tarantino's Star Wars? Digital Cinema, Media Convergence, and Participatory Culture. In
  20. (2004). Redefining the "Transformative Use" of Copyrighted Works: Toward a Fair Use Standard in the Digital Environment.
  21. (2007). Rethinking the Music Industry. doi
  22. (2010). Supply Responses to Digital Distribution: Recorded Music and Live Performances. doi
  23. (2009). The Digital Britain Final Report. June. s/digitalbritain-finalreport-jun09.pdf EFF
  24. (2010). The Digital Economy Act.
  25. (2007). The Impact of Music Downloads and P2P Filesharing on the Purchase of Music: a Study for Industry Canada. Toronto: Industry Canada: doi
  26. (2008). Trends in Open Source. doi
  27. (2009). Ups and downs: Economic and cultural effects of file sharing on music, film and games. Delft: TNO/SEO/IViR: IFPI
  28. (2010). Web Server Survey. 15 April, Oberholzer-Gee, Felix

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.