Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Measuring quality in social care services: theory and practice

By Juliette Malley and José-Luis Fernández

Abstract

Measuring and assessing service quality in the social care sector presents distinct challenges. The 'experience' good properties of social care, for instance, and the large influence played by subjective judgements about the quality of personal relationships between carer and user and of process-related service characteristics make it difficult to develop indicators of service quality, including those of service impact on final outcomes. Using some of the key features of the 'Production of Welfare' approach, the paper discusses recent developments in the UK of the theoretical and practical frameworks used for assessing quality in social care and for understanding the final impact of services on the wellbeing of their recipients. Key current and future challenges to the development of such frameworks include difficulties in disentangling the impact of social care services on final outcomes from the often dominating effects of other, non-service related factors, and the generalization of consumer-directed care models and of the 'personalization' of care services. These challenges are discussed in the context of the different possible applications of quality indicators, including their role as supporting the service commissioning process and their use for assessing the performance of service providers

Topics: HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology, RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the International Centre of Research and Information on the Public, Social and Cooperative Economy (CIRIEC)
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00422.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:30137
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. doi
  2. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. doi
  3. (1996). A framework for analysing the measurement of outcome. IN
  4. (2001). A new conception of social care outcomes and its practical use in assessment with older people.
  5. (1988). A positive choice. Report of the independent review of residential care. Chaired by Gillian Wagner. doi
  6. (2010). A Report on the Development Studies for the National Adult Social Care User Experience Survey, Discussion Paper 2721. Canterbury, Personal Social Services Research Unit.
  7. (2008). Accurate performance measure but meaningless ranking exercise? An analysis of the English school league tables. doi
  8. (2003). Advancing Public Accountability? The Social Services 'Star' Ratings. doi
  9. (2010). Building the National Care Service, CM7854, London, The Stationery Office.
  10. (2007). Care by Spouses, Care by Children: Projections of Informal Care for Older People in England to 2031. Social Policy and doi
  11. (2010). Caring for and caring about: Disentangling the caregiver effect and the family effect. doi
  12. (2005). Challenges in Measuring Nursing Home and Home Health Quality: Lessons From the First National Healthcare Quality Report. doi
  13. (2003). Choices, Policy Logics and Problems in the Design of Long–term Care Systems. Social Policy and doi
  14. (1996). Competition in the mixed economy of care. doi
  15. (2002). Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales. doi
  16. (1978). Cost functions for care services for the elderly. doi
  17. (1990). Defining quality of care: mission impossible? doi
  18. (1978). Economies of scale in residential care. doi
  19. (2000). Equity and Efficiency Policy in Community Care,
  20. (2000). Equity and Efficiency Policy in Community Care.,
  21. (2000). Governance and performance: New perspectives, doi
  22. (1970). Helping the Aged, London, George Allen and Unwin. doi
  23. (2007). How Do Performance Indicators Add Up? An Examination of Composite Indicators in Public Services. doi
  24. (1995). How elderly people rank order the quality characteristics of home services. doi
  25. (2001). Income and health: the time dimension. doi
  26. (1998). Listening to Users of Domiciliary Care Services Leeds,
  27. (2009). Making policy count:Developing performance indicators for health and social care partnerships. Position Paper Social Care.
  28. (2003). Measuring public sector performance. doi
  29. (2010). Measuring the outcomes of care homes: Final report. Discussion Paper 2696/2.
  30. (2008). Measuring User Experience of Social Care Services: A Discussion of Three Approaches. A Report to the Department of Health. Discusssion Paper 2529. Canterbury, Personal Social Services Research Unit.
  31. (2007). Modelling the effect of pupil mobility on school differences in educational achievement. doi
  32. (1998). Modernising Social Services: promoting independence, improving protection, raising standards.
  33. (1981). Old People's Homes and the Production of Welfare,
  34. (2000). Older people's definitions of quality services.
  35. (2006). Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services, doi
  36. (2008). Outcomes Important to People With Intellectual Disabilities. doi
  37. (2009). Outcomes of Social Care for Adults (OSCA). Interim findings. Discussion Paper 2648. Canterbury, Personal Social Services Research Unit.
  38. (1999). Outcomes of Social Care for Disabled People and Carers.
  39. (2002). Outcomes-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness. doi
  40. (1998). Overview: Outcomes of Social Care for Older People. Outcomes in Community Care Practice Series. York, Social Policy Research Unit.
  41. (2007). Performance Assessment Handbook 2006-07. Adult Social Care Services. London, Commission for Social Care Inspection.
  42. (2006). Performance Indicators in Social Care for Older People, doi
  43. (2002). Performance Ratings for Social Services in England,
  44. (1985). Production of Welfare Approach. Discussion Paper 400. Canterbury, Personal Social Services Research Unit.
  45. (2007). Provider and care workforce influences in quality of home care services in England. doi
  46. (2009). Putting People First: Development of the Putting People First User Experience Survey. Discussion Paper 2637. Canterbury, Personal Social Services Research Unit.
  47. (2001). Quality at home for older people. Involving Service users in defining home care specifications, York, The Policy press and Joseph rowntree Foundation. doi
  48. (2007). Quality of life. In National Care Homes Research Forum. My Home Life Report.
  49. (2004). Raising the quality of home care: a study of service users' views. Social policy and administration, doi
  50. (2006). Regional variability in public long-term care expenditure in England: the significance of local autonomy, exogenous influences and local spillovers. PSSRU Discussion Papers.
  51. (2005). Securing better outcomes: developing a new performance framework.
  52. (1997). Social Care in Old Age: More Than a Funding Problem. doi
  53. (1995). Social determinants of health - socioeconomic status, social class, and ethnicity. doi
  54. (2002). Social Work and Direct Payments, doi
  55. (2006). Structure and logic of regulation and governance of quality of health care: was OFSTED a model for the Commission for Health Improvement? Health Economics, doi
  56. (2004). The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know. doi
  57. (2005). The Dilemma of the unsatisfied customer in a market model of public administration. doi
  58. (1984). The economics of social care, doi
  59. (2000). The management and effectiveness of the home care service.
  60. (1981). The measurement of outcome in social care of the elderly. doi
  61. (2007). The new performance framework for local authorities and local authority partnerships: single set of national indicators.
  62. (1992). The Quality Dimension. Evaluating Quality of Service and Quality of Life in Human Services.
  63. (1988). The quality of care. How can it be assessed? doi
  64. (2003). The Quality of Quality Measurement in U.S. Nursing Homes.
  65. (1996). The Standards we Expect: what services users and carers want from social services workers, London, The National Instiute for Social Work.
  66. (2008). TRANSFORMING SOCIAL CARE, Local Authority Circular LAC (DH)
  67. (1976). University Costs and Outputs, doi
  68. (2006). Younger Adults’ Understanding of Questions for a Service User Experience Survey: A Report to the Information Centre for Health and Social Care. PSSRU Discussion Paper 2360. Canterbury, Personal Social Services Research Unit.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.