Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Uncertain candidates, valence, and the dynamics of candidate position-taking

By Michael Bruter, Robert S. Erikson and Aaron B. Strauss

Abstract

This paper offers graphic illustration of so-called “valence” models of candidates responding to their perceptions of voter location in a two-party system. Models by Groseclose and others show how the combination of candidate uncertainty about the median voter location, nonzero candidate valence, and policy motivated candidates leads to departures from the median voter prediction. With one policy dimension, either there exists an equilibrium where the candidates do not converge to the median (or any other common position) or there exists no equilibrium. We offer illustrations based on plausible conditions. Under some conditions we show an equilibrium where candidates locate at separate policy positions. Under others, we illustrate the absence of equilibrium

Topics: JC Political theory
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s11127-009-9509-9
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:28349
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.springerlink.com/co... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/28349... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.