Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Forthcoming in the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis

By David Easley, Gideon Saar, James Angel, Michael Goldstein, Hans Heidle and Joe Kendrick


A Microstructure Approach Extending an empirical technique developed in Easley, Kiefer, and O’Hara (1996, 1997a), we examine different hypotheses about stock splits. In line with the trading range hypothesis, we find that stock splits attract uninformed traders. However, we also find that informed trading increases, resulting in no appreciable change in the information content of trades. Therefore, we do not find evidence consistent with the hypothesis that stock splits reduce information asymmetries. The optimal tick size hypothesis predicts that stock splits attract limit order trading and this enhances the execution quality of trades. While we find an increase in the number of executed limit orders, their effect is overshadowed by the increase in the costs of executing market orders due to the larger percentage spreads. On balance, the uninformed investors' overall trading costs rise after stock splits. How Stock Splits Affect Trading: A Microstructure Approach I

Year: 1998
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.