Location of Repository

Abstract Zubulake: The Catalyst for Change in eDiscovery

By Penny Herickhoff and Vicki M. Luoma

Abstract

South Africa and the United States have recently changed their rules of discovery in an attempt to make sense of all this data and determine what, when and how data should be disclosed by parties in litigation. Case law in these countries has been defining the responsibilities of potential parties and attorneys to prepare for litigation that might happen. The case that was the catalyst of change was the 2003 United States case Zubulake v. UBS Warburg, LLC. Prior to this case judges and attorneys were trying to determine how to deal with electronic data that was becoming more voluminous. In this case, the court made a series of five pretrial orders concerning disputes over electronic discovery issues. These orders included defining accessible and inaccessible data, analyzing cost-shifting, and litigants ’ duties to preserve electronic documents and consequences for failure to have an appropriate retention and deletion policy. This paper reviews the key aspects of the Zubulake case and examines the impact of the case on corporate record retention policies. This case was an important harbinger regarding how the discovery rules needed to be changed or redefined to accommodate the electronic data world

Topics: e-discovery, Zubulake, UBS Warburg, meet-and-confer, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, litigation
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.188.8425
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • http://igneous.scis.ecu.edu.au... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.