The purpose of the present study is to examine teachers’ use of cognitive processing
language (CPL), which facilitates high levels of processing and metacognition, as it relates to
first-grade students’ strategy use in the context of memory and mathematics performance. In
addition, child-level executive functioning (EF) is explored by studying the ways in which EF is
associated with student performance in both of these domains. Finally, an effort is made to
examine the interaction between EF and CPL so as to understand the joint effects of
environmental and child-level variables in relation to students’ strategy use in memory and math.
Data were collected over the course of one academic year from a sample of 14 teachers and 87
students in the form of classroom observations and individual child assessments. Following the
coding of teacher instructional style and the scoring of child-level EF, two median splits were
performed: teachers were classified as either “high-CPL” or “low-CPL,” and students were
characterized as either “high-EF” or “low-EF.” Student outcomes on a memory and a math task
were then analyzed as a function of both classroom environment and individual levels of
executive functioning. Previous findings from this area of research were replicated, showing that
teachers vary naturally in the extent to which they incorporate CPL during math instruction.
Only one of the proposed hypotheses was supported by evidence: low-EF children in high-CPL
classrooms outperformed low-EF students in low-CPL classrooms by the end of the year on one
measure of memory strategy use. This study was an important step in the direction of studying
the interplay between student-level and classroom-level factors that may interact in meaningful
ways in the context of student performance.Bachelor of Art
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.