Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Overcoming barriers to campus greening: a survey among higher educational institutions in London, UK

By Marianne Dahle and Eric Neumayer

Abstract

This paper explores the greening of higher educational institutions. It is based on a survey carried out on a sample of higher educational institutions within London, UK. A qualitative research approach, using semi-structured interviews, is applied to assess: how far the relevant institutions have reached with respect to greening within the areas of energy and solid waste management; what the interviewees consider to be the most important barriers to further greening their campuses; and how such barriers can be reduced, or possibly overcome. The study maintains that although the institutions are not at ground zero with respect to greening, their overall environmental quality is relatively poor, particularly concerning recycling. It is argued that the barrier suggested to be of greatest significance by the interviewees, namely budgetary constrains, is at least partly due to a lack of knowledge concerning how greening initiatives can save costs as well as an institutional reluctance to change. It is concluded therefore that one of the most important measures that needs to be undertaken to overcome barriers to greening is to raise the environmental awareness within campus communities

Topics: L Education (General)
Publisher: Emerald Publishing Group
Year: 2001
DOI identifier: 10.1108/14676370110388363
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:18893
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). A Practical Guide to Academic Research,
  2. (1993). Campus Ecology – A Guide to Assessing Environmental Quality & Creating Strategies for Change. Living Planet Press,
  3. (1987). Commission on Environment and Development doi
  4. (1999). Development Education Panel
  5. (1995). Ecodemia, Campus Environmental Stewardship at doi
  6. (1992). Education for an Environmentally Sustainable Future. doi
  7. (1999). Education for Sustainability – The Need for a new Human Perspective. Second Nature,
  8. (1996). Environmental Policy at the Universitat Autonomia de Barcelona.
  9. (1999). Forum for the Future Higher Education (HE) 21 Project (1999a) Sustainability Indicators for Higher Education (HE) 21, Web-address: http://he.21.org.uk/index.html Forum for the Future Higher Education (HE) 21 Project
  10. (1998). Green Investment, Green Return: How Practical Conservation Projects Save Millions on America’s Campuses. National Wildlife Federation,
  11. (1999). Greening the Ivory Tower. Improving the Environmental Track Record of Universities, Colleges, and Other Institutions. doi
  12. (1996). Implementing Sustainable Development at University Level – A Manual of Good Practice.
  13. (1996). Implementing Sustainable Development: A Case Study.
  14. (1992). Nations Conference on Environment and Development doi
  15. (1978). Offenes und Geschlossenes - Interview: Neue Argumente zu einer alten Kontroverse. In
  16. (2000). Recognising and Addressing Misconceptions on the Concept of Sustainability at University Level.
  17. (1995). Revitalising Higher Education. Peterson’s,
  18. (1996). Staff Development for Curriculum Greening at the University of Hertfordshire. In
  19. (1999). Weak versus Strong Sustainability - Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. doi
  20. (1997). Why do We Recycle? Markets, Values, and Public Policy. Island Press, Washington D.C. 10 The barrier related to a general lack of financial resources is also believed to be significant concerning other greening initiatives. 28

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.