Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis

By Eric Neumayer
Topics: GE Environmental Sciences
Publisher: Sage Publications in association with the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO)
Year: 2002
DOI identifier: 10.1177/0022343302039002001
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1997). 2 Similar results for NOx and SO2 emission reductions are reported in Murdoch, Sandler and Sargent
  2. (2000). 3 For a good overview of this literature, see Panayotou
  3. 4 In many cases greater than 1000. 5 The results are available from this author upon request.
  4. (1996). 6 The rather ambiguous evidence with respect to the impact of democracy and democratisation on environmental outcomes is not confined to quantitative studies, but can also be found in case studies. See, for example,
  5. (2000). A Guide to Modern Econometrics. doi
  6. (2000). A New Dataset for Measuring Democracy, 1810-1998’, doi
  7. (1997). A Tale of Two Collectives: Sulphur versus Nitrogen Oxides Emission Reduction in Europe’, doi
  8. (1999). Aggregating Governance Indicators’, Policy Research Working Paper 2195. doi
  9. (1974). An Inquiry into the Human Prospect.
  10. (2000). Annual Surveys of Freedom Country Ratings 1972-73 to 1999-00,
  11. (1998). Beyond Environmental Scarcity: Causal Pathways to Conflict’, doi
  12. (2001). book: Greening Trade and Investment – Environmental Protection Without Protectionism (Earthscan, doi
  13. (1999). Democracy and Environment: Congruencies and Contradictions in Southern Africa’, doi
  14. (1997). Democracy and Environment’, doi
  15. (1998). Democracy and the Environment: An Empirical Assessment’, doi
  16. (1996). Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects. doi
  17. (1995). Democracy and the Environment’, paper presented to the 36 th doi
  18. (1996). Democratisation and the Environment: NGOs and Deforestation Policies in India (Karnataka) and Indonesia (North Sumatra)’, doi
  19. (1999). Democratization and the Environment: Entrepreneurial Politics and Interest Representation in Taiwan’, doi
  20. (1997). Determinants of Economic Growth – A Cross-Country Empirical Study. doi
  21. (2001). Does Trade Openness Promote Multilateral Environmental Cooperation?. doi
  22. (1992). Earth in the Balance - Forging a New Common Purpose. doi
  23. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment’, doi
  24. (2000). Economic Growth and the Environment’, Working Paper 56.
  25. (1997). Enforcement of Environmental Protection Laws under Communism and Democracy’, doi
  26. (1998). Environment, Economic Growth, and Government’,
  27. (2001). Environmental Sustainability Index. An Initiative of the Global Leaders of Tomorrow Environment Task Force. Davos: World Economic Forum.
  28. (1995). Fisheries, Sovereignties and Red Herrings’,
  29. (1995). Freedom and the Environment’,
  30. (2000). Human Development Report. doi
  31. (1998). Income, Inequality, and Pollution: a Reassessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, doi
  32. (1995). Institutions and Economic Performance: CrossCountry Tests using Alternative Institutional Measures’, doi
  33. (1993). Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in CrossNational Measures’, doi
  34. (2000). logit estimates could have been undertaken. The two techniques provide very similar results (Verbeek,
  35. (1992). Political Institutions and Pollution Control’, doi
  36. (1993). Political Regimes and Economic Growth’, doi
  37. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. doi
  38. (1998). Poverty, Government, and the Global Environment’,
  39. (1997). The Voluntary Provisions of a Pure Public Good: The Case of Reduced CFC Emissions and the Montreal Protocol’, doi
  40. (1995). Tracking Democracy’s Third Wave with the Polity III Data’, doi
  41. (1999). Weak versus Strong Sustainability – Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. doi
  42. (1999). Why do Some Countries Produce so much more Output per Worker than Others?’, doi
  43. (2000). World Development Indicators on CD-Rom. doi
  44. (2000). World Resources 2000-2001. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Biographical statement: ERIC NEUMAYER, b.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.