Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The productive 'consumer' and the dispersed 'citizen'

By Nick Couldry

Abstract

This article argues for a more nuanced approach to the relationships between the figures of ‘consumer’ and ‘citizen’, normally assumed to exist in separate spaces. Against the idea that each acquires information and feelings of connection in isolation (the ‘plugged-in monad model’), the article argues for an open research agenda into how the spaces of public connection that frame both practices are sustained and the common issues of trust that affect them. This is linked to the author’s forthcoming research into media consumption and public connection. The conclusion reflects briefly on the policy implications of this research direction

Topics: HM Sociology
Publisher: SAGE
Year: 2004
DOI identifier: 10.1177/1367877904040602
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:17478
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003a) Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. doi
  2. (2002). 1 For different criticisms, see Garnham (2000); Barry and Slater
  3. (2003). 2 The project is called ‘Media Consumption and the Future of Public Connection’ and will run from
  4. (1999). 3See also the critical position of Toby Miller on the consumer/citizen binary (Miller,
  5. (2002). 6 ‘Interactivity’ is a slippery term: see McMillan
  6. (2003). 7 For a wider argument about the myth of ‘the media’ as our access-point to a social centre, see Couldry
  7. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. doi
  8. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster. doi
  9. (2000). Can We Live Together? doi
  10. (1987). Communities of Discourse. Harvard: doi
  11. (2002). Community Media: Fenced Off or Walled Out? Finding a Space of Community in the New Media Environment’, paper presented at IAMCR conference,
  12. (1999). Development as Freedom. doi
  13. (2001). Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital?’, doi
  14. (1969). Exit, Voice and Loyalty. doi
  15. (2002). Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions’ doi
  16. (2003). Framing the Future: Indigenous Communication
  17. (2000). Information Society as Ideology: doi
  18. (1999). Netsurfers Don’t Ride Alone:
  19. (2002). Office of the e-Envoy (2002) ‘In the Service of Democracy’, available from www.edemocracy.gov.uk, last accessed 16
  20. (2002). Open Publishing Document’. http://cat.org.au/maffew/cat/openpub.html last accessed 4
  21. (2002). Oscar (2002a) ‘Data Mining, Privacy and the Future of the Public Sphere’, 2 nd Dixons Lecture,
  22. Passing Ethnographies: Rethinking the Sites of Agency and Reflexivity in a Mediated World’
  23. (2002). Radical Media Projects and the Crisis of Public Media’
  24. (1988). Return of the Actor. doi
  25. (2000). Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: doi
  26. (1999). Television and Citizenship: A New International Division of Cultural Labor?’
  27. (2000). The Age of Access. doi
  28. (2003). The Bishop and his Star: Citizens’ Communication in Southern Chile’ in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World.
  29. (2003). The Independent Media Center Movement and the Anarchist Socialist Tradition’
  30. (2003). The Internet, Social Networks and Reform doi
  31. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. doi
  32. (1994). The System, The Actor and the Social Subject’, Thesis Eleven, doi
  33. (1999). The Uses of Complicity in the Changing Mise-en-scene of Anthropological Fieldwork’ doi
  34. (1995). Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’ doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.