Location of Repository

Bridging levels of analysis in risk perception research: the case of the fear of crime

By Jonathan Jackson, Nick Allum and George Gaskell

Abstract

This paper offers a theoretical treatise that bridges the social and the psychological in risk perception research. We first outline research into the psychology of risk. We then speculate on the idea that people develop a structured narrative to risk, which includes morality, trust, and the dense social meaning of a danger and its impact. From this vantage point, we are better placed to move from psychological analyses of risk perception to the sort of analysis of culture that Mary DOUGLAS provides. Throughout the article we lean on crime as an example

Topics: HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology, HM Sociology
Publisher: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:15516
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2005). A disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of risk. doi
  2. (1996). A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, doi
  3. (1996). Against the gods: the remarkable story of risk. doi
  4. (1987). Anticipatory anxiety and risk perception. doi
  5. (2002). Associations between affect and risk perception. doi
  6. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. doi
  7. (2003). Combining classificatory and discursive methods: Consistency and variability in responses to the threat of crime. doi
  8. (1996). Competing conceptions of risk. Available at: http://www.piercelaw.edu/risk/vol7/fall/thompson.htm [Date of Access:
  9. (2000). Consequences matter, "risk" is marginal.
  10. (1992). Cultural theory and risk analysis. doi
  11. (2005). Current directions in risk research: Reinvigorating the social? Social Contexts and Responses to Risk Working Paper 8. Canterbury: Social Contexts and Responses to Risk Network,
  12. (2001). Degrees of estrangement: The cultural theory of risk and comparative penology. doi
  13. (2004). Experience and expression: Social and cultural significance in the fear of crime. doi
  14. (1990). Fear of crime and mass media crime reports: Testing similarity hypotheses.
  15. (1995). Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk. doi
  16. (2000). Feeling is believing: Some affective influences on belief. In doi
  17. (1991). Governmentality. In Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon & Peter Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect (pp.87-104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. doi
  18. (2003). In Nick Pidgeon, Roger E. Kasperson & Paul Slovic (Eds.), The social amplification of risk (pp.159-174). Cambridge: doi
  19. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. doi
  20. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: doi
  21. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: doi
  22. (2001). Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. doi
  23. (2006). Nick Allum & George Gaskell: Bridging Levels of Analysis in Risk Perception Research: The Case of the Fear of Crime
  24. (2006). Nick Allum & George Gaskell: Bridging Levels of Analysis in Risk Perception Research: The Case of the Fear of Crime Girling,
  25. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. doi
  26. (1923). Primitive mentality. London: George Allen and Unwin. doi
  27. (1979). Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk. doi
  28. (1966). Purity and danger: Concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. doi
  29. (1971). Relations in public. doi
  30. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. doi
  31. (1982). Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. doi
  32. (1993). Risk and recreancy: Weber, the division of labor, and the rationality of risk perceptions. doi
  33. (1990). Risk as a forensic resource.
  34. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, doi
  35. (2001). Risk as feelings. doi
  36. (2004). Risk as politics, culture as power. doi
  37. (1998). Risk perception by offshore oil personnel related to platform movements. doi
  38. (1999). Risk perception research: review and documentation. doi
  39. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity. doi
  40. (1995). Risk, rationality and misfortune: Towards a sociology of accidents. doi
  41. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, doi
  42. (2004). Signal crimes and signal disorders: notes on deviance as communicative action. doi
  43. (2001). Social amplification of risk: The media and the public. Health and Safety Executive Contract Research Report 329/2001.
  44. (1969). Social benefit versus technological risk. doi
  45. (1994). Social identity, availability and the perception of risk. doi
  46. (1995). Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society.
  47. (1992). Society for the Prevention of Accidents doi
  48. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risk and benefits. doi
  49. (2002). The affect heuristic. In Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin & Daniel Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp.397-420). New York: doi
  50. (1999). The ethics of truth-telling and the problem of risk. doi
  51. (2000). The influence of emotions on beliefs. In doi
  52. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. doi
  53. (2003). The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In Nick Pidgeon, Roger E. Kasperson & Paul Slovic (Eds.), The social amplification of risk (pp.13-46). Cambridge: doi
  54. (2003). The social amplification of risk. Cambridge: doi
  55. (2003). The social dynamics of environmental risk perception: implications for risk communication research and practice. In Nick Pidgeon, Roger E. Kasperson & Paul Slovic (Eds.), The social amplification of risk (pp.262-285). Cambridge: doi
  56. (2005). Towards a social psychological perspective on the fear of crime. Manuscript in preparation. Jackson, Jonathan (in press). Introducing the fear of crime to risk research. Risk Analysis. doi
  57. (1979). Trust and power. doi
  58. (2003). Understanding amplification of complex risk issues: the risk story model applied to the EMF case. In Nick Pidgeon, Roger E. Kasperson & Paul Slovic (Eds.), The social amplification of risk (pp.286-301). Cambridge: doi
  59. (1987). Was there a probabilistic revolution 1800-1930? In Lorenz Kruger, Lorraine Daston & Micheal Heidelberger (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution (pp.45-55).
  60. (1979). Which risks are acceptable? doi
  61. (1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. doi
  62. (1937). Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande. London: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.