Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Conception and the irrelevance of the welfare principle

By Emily Jackson

Abstract

This article challenges the assumption that their future children's welfare is a relevant consideration when deciding whether to provide a person with assisted conception services. It does not argue that infertility treatment ought to be available as of right. Rather, this article's proposal is that section 13(5) – which specifies that no-one shall receive assistance with conception unless account has first been taken of the welfare of any child who might be born – should be deleted from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Extending the 'welfare principle' to decisions taken prior to a child's conception is shown to be unjust, meaningless and inconsistent with existing legal principle

Topics: RG Gynecology and obstetrics, HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Year: 2002
DOI identifier: 10.1111/1468-2230.00374
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:6967
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www3.interscience.wiley... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/6967/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.