Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Assessing the impact of illness, caring and ethnicity on social activity

By Lucinda Platt

Abstract

It has long been accepted that lack of social participation in wider society is one aspect or one definition of poverty. Current concerns with the extent and distribution of social capital as both a measure of a good society and as means to upward mobility also emphasise the importance of social contacts and networks to the well-being of individuals and communities. While research has often focused on ‘civic participation’ and the measurement of trust, more informal social bonds are also a crucial part of individuals’ social capital. Moreover, informal social capital or social participation might be particularly important for those whose circumstances make them already more vulnerable to marginalisation, exclusion or poverty. For example, social interaction has been argued to be conducive to better outcomes for those with health problems; and there is an extensive literature which aims to chart and explain the role of ‘ethnic capital’ in the life chances of minority ethnic groups. I use the British Home Office Citizenship Survey 2001 for England and Wales to explore the impact on four aspects of lack of social engagement of long-term illness, caring for someone with such an illness, and ethnicity. Controlling for a range of characteristics and examining the relationships separately for men and women there is evidence that between them, the four measures reveal an underlying propensity for reduced social contact. Other things being equal, illness has little association with reduced social participation, but caring does seem to affect opportunities for sociability. Members of some ethnic groups are less likely to engage in neighbourly social visiting than others, and these differences are little affected by income level. By contrast differences in ‘going out’ across groups can largely be explained by differences in income. Overall, social engagement among male Bangladeshis and to a lesser extent Pakistanis is high, whereas Black Africans and Black Caribbeans, especially women, are notable for their lack of opportunities for social engagement compared with their otherwise similar peers. They would appear to be particularly at risk of social isolation, with consequences for their current and future welfare

Topics: HT Communities. Classes. Races, HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology, RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:6239
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). and others
  2. (2000). Are refugees social capitalists?’
  3. (2000). Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. doi
  4. (2003). Communities Research and BMRB International, Home Office Citizenship Survey, doi
  5. (2004). Disability and disadvantage: selection, onset and duration effects’. doi
  6. (1983). Disability and Disadvantage: The consequences of chronic illness. doi
  7. (2005). Diversity, Trust and Community Participation in England.
  8. (2002). Dynamics of social capital; trends and turnover in associational 40 membership in England and Wales, doi
  9. (2005). Early Findings from the 2005 Home Office Citizenship Survey, Home Office Online Report 49/05, available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/citizenshipsurvey.html.
  10. (2000). Enduring Economic Exclusion: Disabled people, income and work.
  11. (1992). Ethnic capital and intergenerational mobility’, doi
  12. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium’, doi
  13. (2000). Gender, ethnicity and self-reported health: the case of African-Caribbean populations in London’, doi
  14. (2004). Home Office Citizenship Survey: People, Families and Communities, Home Office Research Study 289, London: Home Office. doi
  15. (2002). Home Office Findings 253. London: Home Office. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs05/r253.pdf
  16. (2004). Life Satisfaction and trust in other people’.
  17. (1996). Moving Off Income Support: Barriers and bridges.
  18. (2003). Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood’,
  19. (2001). Office for National Statistics [ONS] doi
  20. (2001). Paying the Price: Carers, poverty and social exclusion. London: Child Poverty Action Group.
  21. (2001). Poor people, poor places, and poor health: the mediating role of social networks and social capital’, doi
  22. (2000). Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain.
  23. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources and standards of living. doi
  24. (2006). Poverty’, doi
  25. (1996). Resources, Deprivation and Poverty. doi
  26. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies’, doi
  27. (2002). Social capital and mental health’,
  28. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital’, doi
  29. (2000). Social capital, SES and health: an individual-level analysis’, doi
  30. (2002). Social Capital: A discussion paper. London: Performance and Innovation Unit.
  31. (1998). Social capital: It’s origins and applications in modern sociology’, doi
  32. (2003). Social networks and coronary heart disease risk factors doi
  33. (2005). Summarising multiple deprivation’.
  34. (1990). Support networks of Asian and British families: comparisons between ethnicities and between generations’,
  35. (1980). The effects of social resources on recovery and perceived sense of control among the disabled’, doi
  36. (1997). The Forms of Capital. Education: Culture,
  37. (1997). The Health of Britain's Ethnic Minorities. London: Policy Studies Institute. doi
  38. (1999). The Health of Minority Ethnic Groups doi
  39. (1984). The relationship of social networks and social support to morbidity and mortality’,
  40. (1993). The role of social support in mediating the psychological consequences of economic stress’, doi
  41. (1973). The strength of weak ties’, doi
  42. (2000). The two meanings of social capital’, doi
  43. (2003). Trends in social capital: membership of associations in doi
  44. (2000). Validating self-rated health in different ethnic groups’, doi
  45. (2003). Volunteers, Helpers and Socialisers: Social capital and time use. London: Office for National Statistics, Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/CCI/article.asp?ID=319
  46. (1993). With This Body: Caring and disability in marriage. Buckingham: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.