Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Refinancing Europe’s higher education through deferred and income-contingent fees: an empirical assessment using Belgian, German and UK data

By Vincent Vandenberghe and O. Debande

Abstract

The arguments for refinancing the European Union’s (EU) higher education via higher tuition fees largely rest on preserving the profitability of the educational investment and offering deferred and income-contingent payments. Using income survey datasets on Belgium, Germany and the United Kingdom (UK) we first estimate how graduates’ private return on educational investment is likely to be affected by higher private contributions. We then evaluate the effect of income-contingent and deferred payment mechanisms on lifetime net income and its capacity to account for graduates’ ability to pay, considering numerous ways of financing the cost of introducing income-contingency. Our analysis reveals that increasing individuals’ contributions to higher education costs, through income-contingent and deferred instruments, does not significantly affect the private rate of return of heterogeneous graduates, allows for payments to be indexed to ability to pay, and can be implemented in ways that minimize the risk of adverse selection. These findings prove robust to significant variations between countries’ unharmonised higher education institutional structures

Topics: L Education (General)
Publisher: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:6211
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1968). A graduate tax’,
  2. (2002). An investigation of education finance reform – Graduate taxes and income contingent loans in the Netherlands,
  3. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom, doi
  4. (1997). Conceptual Issues and the Australian Experience with Income Contingent Charges for Higher Education’, doi
  5. (2004). Education at a Glance, doi
  6. (1999). Estimates of the payoff of attending a selective college. An application of selection on observables and unobservables, NBER Working Paper, No 7322, doi
  7. (2003). Funding higher education in the UK: the role of fees and loans’, doi
  8. (2004). Higher Education Funding’, doi
  9. (2003). Human capital in a global and knowledge-based economy, part II: assessment at the EU country level, Report for the European Commission, DG for Employment and Social Affairs.
  10. (2003). Human Capital Policy’, doi
  11. (2005). Income Contingent Loans for Higher Education: International Reform, doi
  12. (2004). Investing in human capital: a capital markets approach to student funding, doi
  13. (2001). Labor market policies and equilibrium unemployment: Theory and application to Belgium, Working Paper doi
  14. Office National de l'Emploi (2003), Lien entre rémunération du travail et allocation de chômage,
  15. (2006). Post-Secondary Education and Increasing Wage Inequality, doi
  16. (2005). Revenue Statistics doi
  17. (1955). The Role of Government
  18. (2001). The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.