Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Bayesian networks and the problem of unreliable instruments

By Luc Bovens and Stephan Hartmann

Abstract

We appeal to the theory of Bayesian Networks to model different strategies for obtaining confirmation for a hypothesis from experimental test results provided by less than fully reliable instruments. In particular, we consider (i) repeated measurements of a single test consequence of the hypothesis, (ii) measurements of multiple test consequences of the hypothesis, (iii) theoretical support for the reliability of the instrument, and (iv) calibration procedures. We evaluate these strategies on their relative merits under idealized conditions and show some surprising repercussions on the variety-of-evidence thesis and the Duhem-Quine thesis

Topics: B Philosophy (General)
Year: 2002
DOI identifier: 10.1086/338940
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:2717
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). An Introduction to Bayesian Networks. doi
  2. (2001). Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. doi
  3. (1995). Bayesianism and Diverse Evidence”, doi
  4. (2001). Comments on Stephan Hartmann and Luc Bovens, “The Import of Auxiliary Theories of the Instruments: a Bayesian-Network Approach”,presented at the Pacific APA.
  5. (2001). Comments on Stephan Hartmann and Luc Bovens, “The Varietyof-Evidence Thesis and the Reliability of Instruments: a Bayesian Network Approach’”, presented at the Central APA.
  6. (1979). Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory”, doi
  7. (1994). Dynamic Belief Networks for Discrete Monitoring”, doi
  8. (1996). Further Illustrations of the Bayesian Solution of Duhem’s Problem”, http://www.princeton.edu/˜bayesway/Dorling/dorling.html Earman,
  9. (1988). It Probably is a Valid Experimental Result: a Bayesian Approach to the Epistemology of Experiment”, doi
  10. (1999). Measuring Confirmation”, doi
  11. (1996). Novelty, Severity and History in the Testing of Hypothesis: doi
  12. (1990). Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems. doi
  13. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. doi
  14. (1983). Recent Work in Inductive Logic”, doi
  15. (1989). Scientific Reasoning—The Bayesian Approach. (2nd ed.) Chicago: doi
  16. (1980). Stochastic Independence, Causal Independence, and Shieldability”, doi
  17. (1986). The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress. doi
  18. (1999). The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the problem of measure sensitivity”, doi
  19. (2001). The Variety-of-Evidence Thesis and the Reliability of Instruments: A Bayesian-Network Approach”, (forthcoming) http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/documents/disk0/00/00/02/35/index.html
  20. (2013). This content downloaded from 158.143.197.56 on Wed,
  21. (1999). Unified Prediction and Diagnosis in Engineering Systems by Means of This content downloaded from 158.143.197.56 on Wed,
  22. (2000). What Experiment Did We just Do? Counterfactual Error Statistics and Uncertainties about the Reference Class”, Talk presented at PSA doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.