Location of Repository

Geography and international inequalities: the impact of new technologies

By Tony Venables

Abstract

Some writers have predicted that new technologies mean the ''death of distance'', allowing suitably skilled economies to converge with high income countries. This paper evaluates this claim. It argues that geography matters for international income inequalities, and that new technologies will change, but not abolish this dependence. Some activities may become more entrenched in high income countries than they are at present. Others - where information can be readily codified and digitized - will relocate, but typically only to a subset of lower income countries. These countries will benefit, but other countries will continue to experience the costs of remoteness

Topics: T Technology (General), HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Publisher: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2001
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:2179
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1999). Two Waves of Globalisation: Superficial Similarity and Fundamental Differences" NBER working paper, doi
  2. (2001). The death of distance 2.0; how the communications revolution will change our lives’, doi
  3. (2000). The impact of economic integration on FDI and exports; a gravity approach’, CEPS working document no 156,
  4. (1998). Global shift; transforming the world economy’ Chapmans,
  5. (2001). Outsourcing to India’. doi
  6. (1998). Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy’, doi
  7. (1999). The spatial economy; cities, regions and international trade’, MIT press doi
  8. (1999). Geography and economic development’, doi
  9. (1998). Information technology and the future of cities’, doi
  10. (1998). Incentives in organisations’, doi
  11. (1999). Incomplete contracts and industrial organisation’, NBER wp. No 7303. doi
  12. (1954). The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States’, doi
  13. (1998). The boundaries of the firm revisited ’, doi
  14. (1999). Have international transportation costs declined’, mimeo,
  15. (2000). Time as a trade barrier’, mimeo doi
  16. (2001). The geography and channels of diffusion at the world’s technology frontier’, processed doi
  17. (1999). Agglomeration in the US auto supply industry’ Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago,
  18. (1920). Alfred (1890), Principles of Economics. doi
  19. (1999). The software sector; a statistical profile for selected OECD countries’, OECD doi
  20. (2000). Economic Geography and International Inequality’, CEPR DP, 2568, revised version at http://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/ajv/winc.pdf
  21. (1975). Markets and hierarchies; analysis and antitrust implications, doi
  22. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, doi
  23. (1998). Just how big is global production sharing’ World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 1871.Figure 1: Trade costs and wages t Intermediates 50% country 1 costs Wages relative to central wages No intermediates
  24. (1940). 3: Transportation versus Communication Costs,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.